| Re: M'I.5,Persecutio n , M I5 Insist tha t th ese F axes mu st Continu e |
Road Runner High Speed O .. |
| rwalker (rwalker@despammed.com) |
2007/12/31 22:22 |
Well, at least this time the MI5 persecution could be considered to be on
topic.
<eievme@bigfoot.com> wrote in message news:wh0711311154348405@4ax.com...
>
> MI5 Persecution Update: Friday 31 March,. 2000
>
> 22,544 Faxes Delivered in Three Years,. and Still No Breakthrough
>
> In the last three. years I have sent at least 22,544 faxes to recipients
> in
> the UK, of which at least 13,974. have gone to Westminster. Last weekend
> alone I sent. 832 completed faxes to politicians, the media and various
> others, on the subject of. MI5s mistreatment of me these last ten years.
>
> I believe some of the recipients know. of MI5s actions against me in the
> last. decade; yet they maintain strict "omerta" in fear of the security
> services persecution actions being made. public.
>
> MI5 Insist that. these Faxes must Continue
>
> Between September 1999 and. mid-January 2000, the persecutors, whoever
> they
> might be, mostly left me alone. I. counted only three incidents in almost
> five months - which is a lower rate than at. any time since June 1990,
> when
> this. business started.
>
> By leaving me alone for several months,. the "oppressors" were making an
> implicit assurance that they would continue to. leave me alone in the
> future. On 11 January I posted to an. internet newsgroup accepting what I
> saw as their. assurance of no further harassment, stating that I would
> cease sending these. faxes - which is the only thing I do in my defence -
> if they continued to. leave me alone. And for two weeks I did indeed
> refrain from distributing these. articles.
>
> But MI5 acted in bad faith. From the last week. of January until the
> beginning of March, they resumed. their hate campaign against me with a
> vengeance. They even put people in my road three times in. February, one
> instance of which I. recorded. They resumed their normal behaviour of
> bugging my phone and house,. listening to where I would go, and then
> placing people in that location to "aggravate and. annoy" me.
>
> What MI5 did in February is plainly. a contravention of the Protection
> from
> Harassment Act 1997, since it has caused. me "alarm and distress" as
> specified in the Act. But it is a waste. of time going to the police with
> a
> complaint, since the police have done, and. will do, absolutely nothing. I
> complained to the. Metropolitan Police in 1995, and they refused to take
> my
> complaint. When I complained. again in 1999, the detective sergeant
> laughed
> at my complaint, with the. words, "It's an absolute load of rubbish. I
> don't investigate rubbish. I can't be. more blunt or to the point than
> that." It is useful to remember that the Met. also treated Stephen
> Lawrences parents with similar. discourtesy; police prejudices are similar
> in my case, so I can take some comfort from that. case and hope that one
> day I will get a fair. hearing.
>
> MI5 acted in bad faith,. but they also acted with arrogance. They do not
> care if I send. 800 faxes every weekend, since they know I cannot prove my
> claims, and the recent. Shayler case shows how weak external oversight is
> of the secret services. But they acted with more than arrogance -. the MI5
> agents actually want my. faxes to continue, they insist that these faxes
> continue, since my communications. give them an excuse to continue their
> activities, and continue in the paid employ of. the secret service.
> Despite
> their use of diverse. proxies over the last ten years, it is the same MI5
> officers behind the campaign all the time - I have seen. one of them on
> three occasions in Canada over a period of years, and. it is a safe belief
> that that. same person continues to be paid for his "work" in harassing me
> in London now. The. average cost of an MI5 employee is some 75,000 per
> annum, so one may. infer that their officers are amply compensated; their
> insistence that "hostilities" are. maintained is understandable when
> placed
> in. this light.
>
> 12711
>
>
> --
> Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
> ------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDem
|
|
|