d.magitis <d.magitis@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> Sorry no climate prediction model here.
Then you're hardly qualified to comment, are you? Perhaps you
have other relevant expertise?
> I'd have more chance of predicting
> the lottery and so would everybody else creating such models.
OK, so no doubt you can despite the technicalities and accuracy
of climate models with the best of them. Pick one from a well
respected research group, and let's discuss it.
> Link of interest and debate:
> http://www.channel4.com/science/microsites/G/great_global_warming_swindle/index.html
A contemporary TV documentary? And one deliberately titled for
controversy? Yes, that's where we'll find reliable information,
naturally. And apparently it turns it's viewers into experts!
> <kinslerp@delillo.lsr.ph.ic.ac.uk> wrote in message
> news:lstcc4-smf.ln1@moo.uklinux.net...
> > d.magitis <d.magitis@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> >> Create a Myth and call it Global warming.
> >> [...]
> >
> > I assume you're willing to provide details of your climate
> > model, including how it agrees with past climate changes
> > under the influence of environmental and solar changes.
> > Once we can examine it, we can discuss how accurately
> > you've describe the effect of cloud cover, for example,
> > which is always tricky.
> >
> > #Paul
|
|