Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Bert Root" <bertrootNOSPAM@dsl.pipex.com>
Newsgroups: alt.surrealism
References: <a5d46a5fa47a72b6e1883fea1b63331d@mixmaster.it> <4255c94d$0$294$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com> <1112931268.090761.123940@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Blind in Myanmar taught to read future
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:07:05 +0100
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
Lines: 65
Message-ID: <4256c79b$0$295$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 81-178-144-116.dsl.pipex.com
X-Trace: 1112983452 news-text.dial.pipex.com 295 81.178.144.116:1282
X-Complaints-To: abuse@uk.uu.net
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.surrealism:1906
Prior to the stampede littlemouse_16@yahoo.com tryped
> Well, let's see. Refuses to deny that he (person posting as Bert
> Root, among other names he uses) that he has the behavioral patterns
> of a rapist, refuses to deny that he has raped someone, refuses to
> meet someone face to face who is willing to take that risk, so we have
> established also that he is afraid of direct confrontation, a part of
> that same pattern of behavior mentioned above. And does so in 4
> different newsgroups on the internet in front of how many people? And
> having the no-archive bit set doesn't make any difference because his
> replies are preserved in people's responses to his posts, not to
> mention any that have been saved to a hard drive for forwarding to the
> appropriate people.
Really? What makes you think I am afraid of direct confrontation? Back down
littlefella.Get a more fulfilling hobby. I don't need to rape as people like
myself who can interact with people *as well as* a keyboard rarely do.
> Language patterns for obscenities tend to be specific to cultural
> upbringing, so most likely he is an American or raised in an American
> environment.
You think?
> Keep posting away -- you apparently didn't read the manuals at MIT for
> anonymizer software, where it states, according to the developers of
> anonymizer software, that a person using it can be tracked down if
> those interested in tracking him/her have enough headers to go on.
> And that there is no way to avoid this. The more you post, the more
> information you give to track you back to where you live. Even
> running through 2 or more anonymizers won't help if there are enough
> posts/emails. And you have been posting a lot, lately.
Didn't read them because I have no need to as I am fully aware of how
remailers work, hence why I don't use them.
> I have almost enough to go to law enforcement. Doesn't need to be
> enough for an arrest, just needs to be enough to meet the minimum
> standards of probable cause, which he is not aware of, or he would
> never have been posting here in the first place in the manner that he
> does.
Buhahahaha!!!
> Come to think of it, we do have a possible implied threat to jirjis
> some time ago, stored in a reply or perhaps even in someone's hard
> drive, if not in Google's cache, as Google keeps a large number of
> things cached even after they have expired from the web a long time
> ago (do a Google search on just about anything, and if you look in the
> results, you will see for many things at the bottom of each result it
> will say "cached" where it stores web pages and lists long after they
> have disappeared from the web. I have found things through the cached
> part of Google that were taken off the web up to a year ago.)
Ooh clever boy. I am truly impresssed by your skills.
One thing to be clear on. I trawl *this* group because I have an interest in
Half Life 2 and am getting a little sick of seeing the banal inane
cross-posted drivel that you lot can't seem to stop posting here. Find a new
playground kiddies. This one is *not* surreal.
--
|
|