Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: DOC <docREMOVEthis@it-smells.com>
Newsgroups: alt.pantyhose
Subject: Re: Louise Hodges. DSCF0348.jpg (44 of 54)
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:11:39 -0400
Message-ID: <4fu5d1dv9n25vc444olm044hrmdfdrq2nj@4ax.com>
References: <GaqAe.121465$Vo6.50654@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk> <21852-42D26198-232@storefull-3275.bay.webtv.net> <42D1AE17.F8AC7024@a.com> <mmc5d19lq4pinmsf6h0k4lie4qg3fpt638@4ax.com> <42D1BE23.481D280E@a.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 173
Organization: Unknown
X-Complaints-To: abuse@shared-secrets.com
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.pantyhose:664
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:36:32 +0000 (UTC), ac <a@a.com> wrote:
>DOC
>
>I don't see how honesty is an issue here .... but if anything it's you who
>are dishonest (you always grasp at this smokescreen)
>My problem with you is simple. Let me explain
>You act like you are lord of the group.
Okay, so everything else is bullshit. That's the "dishonest" part of
your constant whining. Your problem is that you started acting like
the "lord of the group" within days of your arrival here last fall and
you've posted nothing "constructive".
>You contribute nothing constructive .... you only post advertising for your
>business -
No, it is you that post nothing "constructive".
I post my own (owned stuff) that I made myself.
Every on topic pic anyone makes is a "construction" toward pantyhose
enjoyment. Most pics of value, including those you praise, are
commercial in nature.
I also posted here non-commercially for about 10 years but I can be
more "constructive" by creating my own material rather than re-hashing
others.
Most of the guys here, if they could do what I do and get away with
it, would do about the same. And then try to keep it going as I do.
And then have to deal with newbie punks like yourself who talk out of
their ass and throw dishonest flames out of sheer spite, anger, and
jealousy. Why don't you grow up, "ac".
>even when someone asks for advice on newsreaders ...
>You reply, not with a link to the "official" www.yEnc.org site but with a
>link to your own site.... all the info you need is here!
>Yet you never mention that you don't use yEnc yourself (you don't do you?)
Of course! I collected the useful information and hosted it for a year
or two. It's good advice. What makes any link "official"? The name?
Who gives a fuck, I have provided useful info for others here for
years while you come in here to throw stones because no one other
children would play with you when you showed up here.
I don't post in yenc myself and I have said so more than once in the
past but you are a know-it-all but clueless newbie who will recklessly
throw stones first because you weren't welcomed as our savior when you
got here last fall. It doesn't matter whether I post in yenc or not,
what kind of new bullshit canard will you come up with next?
>The solution is simple .... post some decent quality pictures and I'll be
>off your back forever.
FOAD, I owe nothing to trolls. I will use you to keep my name and
stuff here in front of people better, and in all the years I never
reposted much intentionally but now a few rounds of that would be in
order.
>Otherwise I'll keep pushing your button .... and like a good little bitch
>you'll snap.
You are attached to me like an unwanted nancy. You will follow me
around because you have no other life of value and I'm supposed to
"snap"?
As long as you bitch about my lack of reposts or bitch that off topic
is good, or remain dishonest and bitch about my "advertising" while
praising other commercial posts, I get free advertising as one of the
commercial places that does not post off topic here or abuse the
group. It will also give me a chance to let newbies know that I'm the
longest continuous poster in most groups I post to, that I pushed for
binaries here when they were opposed (and I lost my account for that)
and posted a lot of pics over many years some of whom have been
reposted by mudbone, who you praise, and others.
So it won't be a total loss, I figure. The time waste is the only
thing. You are willing to waste a lot more than even some of the
worst trolls we've had here before.
>then Gandalf will remind you that silence is the best tactic (you always
>forget that don't you).
>then your two little testicles cosmo and DC will swing into action ......
You give me too much ammunition so I don't need silence. I'd rather be
visible so new people can get aquainted with me.
As to others or friends who I've gained who support me here, that is
nice. I didn't have to suck the corn out of their assholes as you do
in an effort to try to divide or split the posters in the group. You
tried sucking up to Sam, but he spurned your advances, you ate out
Mudbone's ass but even he wasn't a taker, and today you tried kissing
up to dodger and compare me to him to again try to "divide" or gain
allies for your "non-constructive" quest.
>Again with the dishonesty card and a few incoherent rants ... then DC will
>punctuate the argument (literally).
>
>So DOC prove me a liar when I say you don't post
>Give us just 1 decent post comparable to Sam I'm or 'lag
>and I'll leave you alone forever
>
>can I be plainer than that?
>
>
>ac
Again you are a new idiot who just doesn't know. I posted like 'Lag
or Sam for many years prior to beginning to post my own movie clips.
I don't need to prove anything to the ignorant who come into the group
acting like they are the lord in here (using your words).
Besides, you are a proven liar anyway and you are just still mad about
the way the "old regulars" didn't welcome you so all these other
"issues" are just phony (i.e. dishonest).
So the things you say are simple frauds upon the group. You've been
seeking to divide this group for months now ever since you embarrassed
yourself with long flame wars last fall and winter. You have done
nothing "constructive" (your words) but instead attempt the
destructive even when you try to kiss a new poster's poop shoot in the
hope that someone will be your friend and help you in a destructive
flame war here. Perhaps some day some old enemy of mine or some anon
flame thrower will agree with you and post some remarks against me,
but you are not doing well at all trying to recruit a regular in here
in your queer cyber-stalking of me or your efforts to change this
group just because you arrived here.
>DOC wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 12:57:46 +0000 (UTC), ac <a@a.com> wrote:
>> Hey ac, I thought your "problem" was that I once posted a face pic
>> (head and shoulders to go with another leg pic without face) and that
>> the "face" pic was "off topic" under your definition?
>>
>> No, it was because I was a "commercial" poster (like no pics are
>> commercial here, nor do you praise any)
>>
>> No, maybe it was because I didn't support you when you were arguing
>> yenc with Stomp and Gandalf.
>>
>> No, maybe it's just because you are intellectually dishonest as well
>> as just a dishonest troll. In every post, you try to egg people on
>> to fight each other in an effort to disrupt the group. You are still
>> crying over the fact that your long rambling and stupid discussions
>> when you first came to this group weren't welcomed, as well as your
>> pleas that that some off topic posts are good here.
>>
>> That is the simple root of your anger, just admit it like a man rather
>> than whining and trying to "lash back" later like a immature crybaby.
>>
>> >Dodger
>> >
>> >LOL
>> >you can lead a mule to water.....
>> >
>> >.....there are other commercial posters .....
>> >Take doc for instance (please) no one has ever, or will ever steal and
>> >re-post any of his stuff (even him!!).
>> >The quality is just too poor, the subjects too repetitive -
>> >(I've seen that toe from every conceivable angle - never much else ....
>> >just the toe) .....
>> >....... and how do we know she's wearing pantyhose?.... she could be
>> >wearing anything under all those clothes.
>> >
>> >......even teaser changes his subjects (I think).
>> >
>> >You've got to take it as a complement - yours are always nice subject
>> >....
>> >good quality - worth looking at ..... I always want to see more
>> >
>> >ac
|
|
')){kind=link}