ph
So you'd prefer no posts at all rather than lots of posts ....
some of which may be slightly off topic ....
but still pretty much within the spirit of the group's interests?
That's your decision - but if I may make so bold, in that case sir I think
- you are a moron.
Alternatively .... re-read my post, consider what I'm saying with relation
to other posts on this topic
saying just that - then look in a dictionary for the definition of
sarcasm.
If you want it in simple words, I'm saying that Spooke's posts are
excellent, and that the idiots who complain about a few nylon posts amidst
a sea of good quality on topic posts need to re-evaluate their opinions.
so ph .... do you want a spoon or a fork?
ac
ps spooky - Thanks - and if you have them please post them
phuckit wrote:
> What is wrong with this ass? Ac, maybe you can disprove that part
> about shite alone and eat some.
>
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2005 22:43:27 +0000 (UTC), ac <a@a.com> wrote:
>
> >I simply don't believe it .... an off topic post.......
> >
> >Presumably from recent comments about off topic posting the great and
> >the good (?) will require Spooky to stop posting altogether.
> >
> >....after all .... no post is better than an off topic post!!!
> >
> >That's right isn't it???
> >
> >.... or have I misunderstood ... is it only mudbone's posts we are
> >supposed to find fault with?
> >
> >Spooky, mudbone, leguva, Sam... and all the rest
> >we can't afford to loose any of you guys .....
> >after all the alternatives are teaser and doc's posts.
> >
> >man cannot live on shite alone
> >
> >ac
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Spooky wrote:
> >
> >> [Image]
|
|
 Asian PH - File 166 of 180 - mdg_saki042.jpg (1/1)')){kind=link}