Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: cosmo <nospam@group.com>
Newsgroups: alt.pantyhose
Subject: Re: ERIN totally naked
References: <d7nm0l$sg5$1@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net> <3sydnTUyjJBnqz3fRVn-gw@giganews.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.640
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 22
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 14:07:56 EST
Message-ID: <1117825676.bfd4f71501de825625c5b21113035ba2@teranews>
X-Abuse-Report: http://www.usenetabuse.com
X-Abuse-Notes: Abuse reports must be submited via the usenetabuse.com portal listed above.
X-Abuse-Notes2: Reports sent via any other method will not be processed.
X-Abuse-Notes3: Any other abuse reporting headers in this article are fraudulent.
X-Orginal-Message-ID: <p7a1a11skn2f48gnqv0o1pqde8nvp4mjf7@4ax.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 15:07:13 -0400
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.pantyhose:424
And the digital "make-up" too. A whole another layer of "make up".
Then deflate the phony bags in her chest.
But I bet she has a nice personality!
Fug it, leave her as unreal and altered as she is, at least that makes
her a goddess to some. My problem is I can tell it's fake too easily.
All the "enhancement" is not too subtle.
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 04:54:53 -0600, "Teaser" <Teaser@optonline.net>
wrote:
>No you wouldn't
>
>"Wild Willy" <shaunm@icon.co.za> wrote
>>I would like to see Erin totally naked with no make up on!!!!
>> TIA
>> Wild Willy
|
|