Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: ac <a@a.com>
Newsgroups: alt.pantyhose
Subject: Re: BUT HAVE U SEEN IT-SMELLS WEBSITE? UGH!![01/27] - DSC08304.jpg (1/1)
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 18:56:08 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: BT Openworld
Lines: 174
Message-ID: <42937A0F.C753E671@a.com>
References: <429aafa6_4@spool4-west.superfeed.net> <42999A81.CE72BEE4@a.com> <bjtl91trrg5ag7k98catfc29u60kuk8bqr@4ax.com> <4299B760.CD3CFC82@a.com> <1117472616.c8f6ad772d59e24da918ab1e3ed25a97@teranews> <42920D03.D9684100@a.com> <1117539496.048161151569067ad0a61ff5d77701b8@teranews> <4292CC4F.DEE6DE4A@a.com> <1117563721.95dbe332faf9a6893a6a18ddb1f4436d@teranews>
NNTP-Posting-Host: host81-134-67-22.in-addr.btopenworld.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: nwrdmz01.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com 1117565768 9514 81.134.67.22 (31 May 2005 18:56:08 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news-complaints@lists.btinternet.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 18:56:08 +0000 (UTC)
X-Accept-Language: en
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en-gb]C-CCK-MCD (Win98; U)
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.pantyhose:398
And you sir are a fool ....
If you took the time to read the posts - you'd see that spam is the issue ...
and as for gaining distinction with other posters - anyone who posts without
expecting to gain something gets my admiration.
What part of the sentence don't you understand? ... I can't make it more simple ...
Its not just volume I want from doc ... its a single honest post ....
You say MY argument isn't supportable .... well support YOURS.....
Show me one single series, posted in the last 24 months - by doc, of more than 20
JPGs that isn't direct marketing and I'll shut up.
what's stupid or dishonest about that?
It's always been about DOCs spamming.
Other than gaining troll status yourself and brownie points from doc ... what's your
stake in this?
remember ... just one example ... I can support my argument with many examples some
of them today's posts... let's not cloud the issue ...in this single point .... put
up or shut up
ac
cosmo wrote:
> So now "ac" is saying doc doesn't post enough and you want volume? AC
> is an idiot, a hypocrite and dishonest as I said before. Now ac is
> also searching for phony distinctions with other posters because his
> original "point" turned out to be damn stupid, dishonest and
> unsupportable. You, ac, are a hypocrite asshole because you support
> off topic cross postings by mudbone.
>
> On Tue, 31 May 2005 13:31:48 +0000 (UTC), ac <a@a.com> wrote:
>
> >Not true
> >
> >only DOC's posts are solely used as advertising for a commercial website. The
> >others are good quality contributions which may have been taken by a pro ...
> >and may include the photographer's details .... but only DOC's posts include a
> >sales pitch
> >(When I use STOCKINGS, I favour the classic RH&T and/or.....)
> >and active links to this site .... that to me is the distinction.
> >
> >For SAM - yes I do make that distinction ... I'd rather see good or bad posts
> >in reasonable volumes than DOC's meagre, poor quality purely advertising
> >posts, The groups rely on volume .... not visa.
> >
> >You post to many groups .... as does Matilda and MUDBONE as well as many
> >others ... you all have different styles and opinions on what goes where ....
> >but the thing you all have in common.... is you post..... and don't expect
> >something back.
> >
> >Show me any series of doc's, posted in the last two years which consists of
> >more than 10 low quality promotional DVD grabs and perhaps 2 HQ pikkies. And
> >I'll chew my own hand off.
> >
> >Subject: Re: Oldies - Pre-1998 - !ixOldies001.jpg - 002 of 101 - yEnc -
> >134 K (1/1)
> > Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 00:26:43 -0400
> > From: DOC <docREMOVEthis@it-smells.com>
> > Organization: Unknown
> > Newsgroups: alt.barefoot, alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.fetish.feet
> >Note two NG's ... and how many *.JPG posts .... 5 - yes count them 5, none were
> >barefoot.
> >
> >SAM - I've said my piece - This started because I contacted MUDBONE not doc
> >...... DOC is in my exclusion list - as I agreed with you.
> >When COSMO felt the need to comment - Closely followed by Gandalf.....
> >His initial poorly orchestrated attack on me, which carefully excused MUDBONE
> >as just harmless - (I guess so as not to incite more attention from that
> >direction) - was obviously directed from elsewhere (D or G? I wonder?).
> >
> >But it meant I couldn't avoid seeing doc's post - so I REMed him - just to see
> >- and then replied to the one without a forehead.
> >If that's not allowed (and from what DOC said - it seems he at least thinks
> >it's not) well sorry - in that case, occasionally I'll be off topic. 'cause I
> >sure as hell will not avoid complementing posts, or agreeing (or disagreeing)
> >with threads.
> >If COSMO had kept out of this DOC's plea for sympathy wouldn't have been
> >visible to me..... but it seems he want's to join the gang.... so...
> >
> >Sam while I have no argument with you ... and I do appreciate your efforts in
> >this and many of the other groups (on and off the field) but...
> >(for cosmo's benefit) - I don't expect, or require your approval ...
> >I do have the right to free speech - however distasteful that is to "king doc"
> >-
> >and if cosmo wants to kiss his ring......
> >(COSMO refers to MUDBONE as the "resident retard" and for me ...
> >he has chosen to introduce "gay" into the argument (as did doc) ....
> >I think what is said about homophobes should possibly be considered don't you
> >cos?
> >I've no real problem being called gay .... I'd much rather be described as gay
> >..
> >than being like cosmo - so it's a good swap) -
> >
> >But (and this is possibly another definition that you maybe think I don't fully
> >understand) ... cosmo's choice of language and attitude must qualify him for
> >his very own little troll bridge?) - or do trolls only come in one flavour
> >here?
> >
> >Just don't expect me to watch silently.
> >
> >Now I'll delete the rems ....maybe add a couple of names .... and get on
> >Fair enough??
> >
> >ac
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >cosmo wrote:
> >
> >> You are a jealous crybaby, ac. Why are you picking fights?
> >>
> >> Almost all of the posts in this group are commercial you idiot, and we
> >> wouldn't have the group we got without pavel every day, the early
> >> Cyberlegs stuff etc.
> >>
> >> Why are you so sore? What did doc say to you to make you cry? Why
> >> did you argue with other people in here and not stop? If you have
> >> issues in your life that make you angry and stupid, don't bring them
> >> here, just go home and drink yourself to death, beat your dog, or
> >> whatever to get back at whoever is giving you all these personal
> >> setbacks.
> >>
> >> On Mon, 30 May 2005 19:55:32 +0000 (UTC), ac <a@a.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Cosmo
> >> >
> >> >You got me bang to rights
> >> >
> >> >I deferred to Sam I'm because he is a real poster, I agreed with Mudbone -
> >> >because he is a real poster - and I agree with him.
> >> >
> >> >I disagreed in the past with Doc - because he IS a spammer.
> >> >You on the other hand fit none of these categories ...... just a nothing
> >> >.... so forgive me if I ignore you.
> >> >
> >> >And anyway, I'm not sure how to answer your gimlet insight into my
> >> >personality.
> >> >Have doc send me a list of acceptable topics so I know what I can and
> >> >can't say (his 6 point plan was comprehensive on what not to say).
> >> >So much for this being a rogue group .... I'll leave you and the "Yes"
> >> >crowd to pat each other on the back.
> >> >
> >> >It's obvious that no-one is allowed to disagree or it seems even to agree
> >> >with other posters in the group, or to message them, so what's the point?
> >> >.....
> >> >
> >> >ac
> >> >
> >> >cosmo wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Mudbone is harmless. Now that MikeMike is gone, he is just our
> >> >> resident retard even though he means well. AC is some jealous asshole
> >> >> who still seems unhappy after he came into the group expecting
> >> >> everyone would agree with him all the time with his stupid fights. He
> >> >> is still smarting and can't quit.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
|
')){kind=link}