Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: james92c@gmail.com
Newsgroups: alt.pantyhose
Subject: Re: What happened to pantyhose??
Date: 27 May 2005 13:28:11 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <1117225691.704472.55480@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
References: <1117167709.740384.128000@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
<3bpe91h8f9b2hjlc5tkkgc6cs9h9g0oo3r@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 142.161.24.73
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1117225698 9324 127.0.0.1 (27 May 2005 20:28:18 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 20:28:18 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <3bpe91h8f9b2hjlc5tkkgc6cs9h9g0oo3r@4ax.com>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=142.161.24.73;
posting-account=dF6IOg0AAACNVg32kmUnUVUk9TFfKhk-
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.pantyhose:366
> >I see that lots of young women out there wear stockings (like up to the
> >thigh) when they want to look sexy. When I suggest tights that's what
> >my girl thinks of. She actually thinks the waist of the pantyhose look
> >really silly -- where are people getting this idea??? Though she LIKES
> >the feel of snug tights in cold weather she thinks the full pantyhose
> >thing LOOK STUPID.
> >
> >So that's what women, at least ones in their 20s I hang out with, are
> >thinking these days. Gaaahh!!!
>
> Give it up. It's a lost cause. Retreat to porno. Less hassle, and
> much cheaper in the long run as most of my married (and divorced)
> friends will attest. Doc
Oh c'mon on, that is not true... i fucked her last week in pantyhose
and it was awesome, a dream come true. She likes watching porn together
too so maybe i'll get some of yours doc! ha
All I'm saying is I wish she wore pantyhose day to day, in bed she'll
put them on and straddle my cock just like i want it
|
|