Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:19:05 -0500
Message-ID: <469FF16C.BDB559AA@a.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 00:19:08 +0100
From: ac <a@a.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en-gb]C-CCK-MCD (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.pantyhose
Subject: Re: Another movie (with sample for Ohmster) - in return - can anyone
explain to me how doc's latest post is on topic? -
thumbs20070718142754.jpg (0/1)
References: <53ds93h2o1cqk9glk3v3f3vno03bfaic4a@4ax.com> <gnjs9351hms16hbr3pb9vniolm1gfd091u@4ax.com> <469E4C3C.B0EAA69C@a.com> <j6ms9311i5tjifq0ouinqsfimevgnu3np7@4ax.com> <469EA104.F76C6762@a.com> <kkbt93l521fg4nheiiofiet7qr1lg7umeu@4ax.com> <469F16C6.9A73B89B@a.com> <du5v931mscp9fgm5ptvj0qeaqljemij72o@4ax.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 288
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.155.76.131
X-AuthenticatedUsername: NoAuthUser
X-Trace: sv3-kWon8jjd2hbwDhwG6HVLsYZHRi7g/B9MQ6tGEdNv9Cc2AMJrdKdOcpu81/g9rDFMe23TFiO9XNTjqKY!Hi4yUvFLwmWnw/PsBo3qIh3Lxrj5ewYxfouwWP225K5swv8l7JnA6g==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@btinternet.com
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@btinternet.com
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.35
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.pantyhose:3199
Doc wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 08:46:14 +0100, ac <a@a.com> wrote:
>
> >Doc wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 00:23:48 +0100, ac <a@a.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Doc wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 18:22:04 +0100, ac <a@a.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >Doc wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:47:40 +0100, ac <ac@ac.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >she's wearing jeans for god's sake !!
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >ac
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> LOL, here we go again, a couple weeks of quiet and ac returns to
> >> >> >> whine.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Perhaps Ohmster will take the time to "explain" to ac but frankly it's
> >> >> >> just a waste of time because no explanation will ever satisfy ac. He
> >> >> >> doesn't really care about whatever silly "issue" he may happen to
> >> >> >> raise anyway - there have been no similar complaints by him about
> >> >> >> other posters - this is strictly only about him trying to seek
> >> >> >> personal "revenge" against me for 3 years because I exposed him as an
> >> >> >> ass after he got to this group and began telling others what to do and
> >> >> >> how to post, along with arguing stupidly about yenc (which he
> >> >> >> hypocritically has since posted in).
> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> The Source For Premium Newsgroup Access
> >> >> >> Great Speed, Great Retention
> >> >> >> 1 GB/Day for only $8.95
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Doc
> >> >> >
> >> >> >You've never been frank in your life
> >> >> >and the only thing you've exposed ...... is yourself in the local park
> >> >> >thing is no-one noticed ... they just thought you were holding a
> >> >> >cigarette.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >How about arguing for yEnc when you refuse to use it yourself?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >but ..... Perhaps you *** could *** explain ?
>
> No one owes any explanations to a retard that can't accept
> explanations anyway because he will argue ad nauseam. I argued for the
> ability of posters to use whatever they want, yenc or not, while you
> were telling them what to do.
>
> >> >> >This is your marketing strategy after all .... how and why should people
> >> >> >buy from you when your subject matter doesn't get close to hitting the
> >> >> >topic and have no respect for your customers.
> >> >> >(was she wearing nylons doc? .... was she?)
> >> >> >
> >> >> >endless re-posts ... off topic spam ....
> >> >> >all archived and saved (by accident?!!!)
>
> We'll have to repost the material so people can determine for
> themselves how off topic or on topic is it. Of course pics such as
> these have been on topic for about 10 years before ac got here, but ac
> wishes to dictate new standards for alt.pantyhose.
>
> >> >> >what happens in docland?
> >> >> >I'd love to see inside your head .... that vast unbroken plain - there
> >> >> >must be so much room for all your imaginary friends!
> >> >> >
> >> >> >You may be happy to know ...
> >> >> >it ends here ...
> >> >> >no more flame wars ....
>
> That's a joke. Ac has been engaged in constant flame wars from soon
> after he arrived here. Last 3 years with me, but originally not with
> me, but rather a few other long time regulars here. The reason he's
> been "stuck" on me is that I intervened in his never-ending stupidity
> with others.
>
> As we approach the 3 year mark, maybe I'll repost some of ac's old
> harangues against Stomp, Lycra Fan, Gandalf and Sam. At that time ac
> never flamed me or my pics, including foot pics. It wasn't until
> after I got sick of his constant flame wars and intervened to bitch
> slap ac down as another troll in our history of trolls.
>
> >> >> >just questions .... like how is a pair of jeans on topic?
>
> Like a pair of earrings, retard.
>
> >> >> >why don't you post a contribution rather than just spam
> >> >> >why does gandalf accept your movies ....
> >> >> >but complain about every one else's
> >> >> >None of which you'll answer ...
>
> Because ac is an ass in every way and so it's not "acceptable"? Just
> a wild guess.
>
> >> >> >maybe you'll chose to ramble on yourself ...
> >> >> >despite what you've said about being bored with this .. (almost every day
> >> >> >since 2004 ....)
> >> >> >
> >> >> >..... you ain't backwards about posting a couple of hundred lines yourself
> >> >> >- are you?
> >> >>
> >> >> How about it? I argued for the right of a poster to use whatever he
> >> >> wanted, yenc or no yenc but you argued against yenc, and this is what
> >> >> it all started over, and since then you've used it yourself. You just
> >> >> wanted to tell people what to do from when you first got to the group
> >> >> and got frustrated when it didn't work and were labeled an asshole.
> >> >>
> >> >> So now ac you continue this for 3 years because it's simply stupid and
> >> >> personal now. That's the most "frank" thing anyone can say. It's just
> >> >> obvious. You are a sore loser ac and a baby because grown-ups normally
> >> >> get over things like that.
> >> >>
> >> >> It festered in you so long. Obviously you couldn't wait to get back
> >> >> from your holiday and come up with a new charge to finally "get" me
> >> >> just like the stupid shit from last month claiming I used my foot
> >> >> instead of Arianna's in a post etc. When that fails and you ac look
> >> >> like an ass, you have no shame and just come up with another equally
> >> >> stupid accusation. It never ends. Anyway, here it is, ac is back from
> >> >> vacation, ready to blather and waste time in his endless personal
> >> >> jihad.
> >> >> --
> >> >> The Source For Premium Newsgroup Access
> >> >> Great Speed, Great Retention
> >> >> 1 GB/Day for only $8.95
> >> >
> >> >doc
> >> >
> >> >you tire me
> >> >you have nothing to say ...
> >> >and you obviously have no idea what is and has been said
> >> >so you quote your own versions of reality
> >> >I actually said that it ***could*** have been anyone's foot - even yours.
> >> >boycott ID the foot because of her circus toe (lol - good one boycott).
> >> >and on past evidence you ***could*** quite easily look back through your
> >> >archives
> >> >(jeezus that never ceases to creep me out [shudder])
> >> >to confirm that (you did after all try to (mis)"quote" a post from way back in
> >> >2004......
> >> >you even keep trying to resurrect the yEnc thing
> >> >
> >> >perhaps it's you who should move on doc ....
> >> >
> >> >On the subject of feet ... this isn't a foot group ... it's a pantyhose group
> >> >... ... but subject/spam on/off topic new/repost are all mysteries to you ...
> >> >so I guess it's not not worth more words
> >> >
> >> >go back to spamming the groups pretending to be a benefactor - posting nothing
> >> >new - or of value
> >> >look at my 2 pictures.... buy my goods
> >> >remember 2004??
> >> >
> >> >ac
> >>
> >> There were 2 pics. There was room for 2 foot and jean pics on this
> >> group, just like room for encased pantyhose, ripped pantyhose, wet
> >> pantyhose, crotch only pantyhose, tits and pantyhose or anything else
> >> as long as it doesn't dominate and choke off the rest.
> >>
> >> In fact the person (Ohmster) ac asked to comment or "explain" about
> >> whether the pic was on topic praised the very same pic in another
> >> pantyhose group.
> >> And yet another specifically asked for jeans and pantyhose the week
> >> before. So should ignore them and listen to the stupid yapping dog
> >> named ac? Ac did try to give orders to this long established group
> >> soon after arriving in 2004.
> >> They count, ac, you don't. The subject of the post was clear. AC, you
> >> could have skipped the 2 pics instead of being an ass (again).
> >>
> >> So why ac did you so dishonestly charge that Arianna's foot "could"
> >> have been my foot? Were you really talking about mathematical
> >> possibilities or is this just another way a pathological liar tries to
> >> weasel out when caught (again)?
> >>
> >> AC has no shame. He is willing to look like a complete retard over
> >> and over if only once he could come up with some "charge" against me
> >> that someday someone might buy or believe. Even over 2 pantyhose and
> >> jeans pics. Or the idea that I substituted my foot for Arianna's on a
> >> close-up (for no good reason).
> >>
> >> Retarded shit but that's ac, still pissed off after 3 years because I
> >> personally embarrassed him here after he started picking fights with a
> >> couple other regulars. Ac lost any sense of shame and will do (and
> >> say) anything know, no matter how retarded) in his childish revenge
> >> quest.
> >> --
> >> The Source For Premium Newsgroup Access
> >> Great Speed, Great Retention
> >> 1 GB/Day for only $8.95
> >
> >difference was ... the other pikkies from the other posters
> >you mention showed a little flesh ... and were unarguably pantyhose pics.
> >
> >yours on the other hand .... well she ***could*** have been wearing anything ... it
> >was just a pikkie of a chick ... no fetish orientation other than your words ... no
> >one could possibly have determined what ... if any fetish was represented without
> >them.
> >
> >same with the pikkies of the park bench
> >(still would like to know if they were nylons)
> >and the above hemline landscape .... wtf?
>
> Retard praises posters Paulio, Nevyn, Hudson etc in the past, all of
> whom have posted many similar pics. From when we first started
> posting pictures in this group, there was never a requirement, nor was
> there even ever an argument, about pics like that. Now the genius ac
> arrives to impose a new standard. LOL
>
> >
> >finally ... while we are talking retard ....
> >>>>In fact the person (Ohmster) ac asked to comment or "explain" about
> >>>>whether the pic was on topic
> >
> >look at the subject line ..... it says
> >Re: Another movie (with sample for Ohmster)
> >(this denotes that the movie sample was for ohm)
> >then
> >in return can ***anyone***
> >(anyone = anyone .... not specifically ohm)
> >explain ?????
> >what I'm trying to do here ...
> >I know it's a complete waste of time ... you don't have the cells to understand
> >that this is a general comment
>
> You know it's a waste of time and yet you keep wasting it. AC, I
> found your "expertise". It is in wasting time with your diarrhea of
> the mouth rambling away.
>
> >which is it doc .... are you a liar? .... just stupid? .... or as it looks here ...
> >a stupid liar?
> >(pretty dumb when what you are misquoting is at the top of the post.)
> >
> >>>>praised the very same pic in another pantyhose group
> >oh yea? - which one?
>
> alt.binaries,pictures.pantyhose you dumbass, how many times are you
> willing to be shamelessly proven to be a retard?
>
> >>>>And yet another specifically asked for jeans and pantyhose the week
> >>>>before
> >oh yea - who?
>
> "Oh yea" LOL. Here we go again.
>
> White Zombie, another long time regular, and former major scanner and
> poster. Something you wouldn't know about. Guys like that have
> opinions that count while retards like ac that show up to tell other
> long timers here what to do don't count. It's that simple.
>
> >let's see how good your archive is
>
> You don't need an archive to Ohmster's post a day or 2 ago. WZ's post
> would also still be visible with a good ISP.
>
> >and cross posting as well as spamming ... shame on you!!
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross_posting
>
> Retard again. Here ac is again trying to set new rules to an old group
> that figured out all this shit long ago and settled it. And more
> intellectual dishonesty because ac praised other posters that
> crosspost, including crossposting between the nylons and pantyhose
> groups.
>
> >Excessive crossposting is considered bad form because it multiplies traffic without
> >adding any new content. In the extreme case, if all messages were crossposted to
> >every group, then every group would look exactly the same. A crossposter can
> >minimize this problem by specifying that all responses be directed to a single
> >group.
> >
> >ac
>
> --
> The Source For Premium Newsgroup Access
> Great Speed, Great Retention
> 1 GB/Day for only $8.95
I think you are making it up
not visible to me ... nor to google
why not humiliate me by posting ohm and wz's requests and praise
ac
|
|
 - in return - can anyone explain to me how doc's latest post is on topic? - thumbs20070718142754.jpg (0/1)')){kind=link}