Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:04:45 -0500
Message-ID: <46819B80.A59E98E5@a.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:04:32 +0100
From: ac <a@a.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en-gb]C-CCK-MCD (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.pantyhose
Subject: Re: anyone have pantyhose mpegs?
References: <1625-467D8E94-244@storefull-3253.bay.webtv.net> <Cvjfi.295847$d22.223254@fe03.news.easynews.com> <467E7624.20193F1@a.com> <Ydwfi.146692$AX2.15469@fe04.news.easynews.com> <467EF1D2.2E720F89@a.com> <po3u73dgaskffhab1klscgk8jbeugr1hul@4ax.com> <467F71B1.7339E73B@a.com> <vOYfi.337910$dg3.243125@fe10.news.easynews.com> <4680C4D9.4491FC74@a.com> <468142F1.D66F4F5C@a.com> <7qv283hkfo5gm6dv34d016h2cmhh25ennu@4ax.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 117
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.155.78.139
X-AuthenticatedUsername: NoAuthUser
X-Trace: sv3-o7gpshL3O0xF4xa42OTOZvNmyVC3LKGEA5WCQE/78aRp/JKpxB1TybAiskEdKl9ZDRMYB0IxHVj/wfC!3eqP5kKOvAY2PdD22vpn946Eeh3+XzEv+VgD6LUYS8gX/l60H/O+Hw==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@btinternet.com
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@btinternet.com
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.35
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.pantyhose:3143
Doc wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:46:41 +0100, ac <a@a.com> wrote:
>
> >ac wrote:
> >
> >> Gandalf wrote:
> >>
> >>> ac wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > is she wearing pantyhose ... or nylons?
> >>> >
> >>> > simple question ... one of two words will answer it
> >>> >
> >>> > I notice gandalf couldn't figure out which one ...
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> > ac
> >>>
> >>> Since I was never asked, nor did I ever offer my opinion, your
> >>> conclusion that I "couldn't figure out which one" is obviously
> >>> coming
> >>> out of your ass like everything else you spew.
> >>>
> >>> It's apparent to anyone that's ever seen non-sheer pantyhose [and
> >>> that
> >>> know the difference between them and thigh-highs] that the model is
> >>> wearing pantyhose.
> >>>
> >>> But you, having never seen a pair of pantyhose on anyone but
> >>> yourself,
> >>> wouldn't know that.
> >>>
> >>> Gee. That sounds like one of your conclusions.
> >>>
> >>> You're really not worth this.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> -Gandalf
> >>>
> >>> Never meddle in the affairs of a dragon for you are crunchy and
> >>> taste
> >>> good with ketchup!
> >>
> >>
> >> but g
> >> you did offer your opinion on this thread!
> >>
> >> what about your reaction to the movies? ...
> >> >>It has nothing to do with what I do or do not allow to be posted.
> >> >>There is a multimedia group expressly for this purpose.
> >> >>But, as you've consistently shown, you have this fanatical disdain
> >> for
> >> >>established protocol
> >>
> >> yet a quick look at what's on my isp's server shows your chum doc has
> >> posted these and others
> >> Subject: Improved Pump Dangling P-Hose Toe Suck VIDeo -
> >> Erin03ph01-08.mpg (62/62)
> >> Subject: Tyler Getaway Flick (PH, Ped Pumpin) ViD-sample -
> >> TyGet1away01-05-06-07.mpg (59/59)
> >> Subject: One Pump Lost - R-Toe P hose video - RTph2Lost60.mpg (53/53)
> >> Subject: Flip-Flop P-hose Feet video - EPHFlipTrend01-05.mpg (45/45)
> >>
> >> >>>Gee. That sounds like one of your conclusions.
> >> all of which you didn't see or overlooked ?
> >> so when doc posts 'em - you say nothing ......
> >> conveniently you just happened to notice my efforts
> >> a case of more faces than a townhall clock?
> >> shows that your opinion's aren't worth as much as you think
> >> [Image]
> >>
> >> Look closely - since when did pantyhose show indentations and have
> >> thick patterning
> >> like this? sheer or not ... no way are these pantyhose
> >>
> >> if they are pantyhose ... I'd guess doc wouldn't stop here in his
> >> shoot ... how about a post showing for certain I'm wrong?
> >> just another 6" or so would show me up good!
> >> I somehow guess that that won't be happening
> >> if they were doc would have added the denial and used the opportunity
> >> to post more advertising in one or other of his tirades
> >>
> >> ... instead he has "ignored" or "forgotten" or "misunderstood"
> >> but never denied
> >>
> >> gandalf ... where doc is concerned at least you have no judgement -
> >> and no integrity
> >>
> >>
> >> ac
> >
> >doc .... any comments?
> >gandalf would surely appreciate your support
>
> Yes, I see that not only does ac repost mpegs faster than anyone ac
> has ever complained about (hypocrisy - ac himself doesn't believe in
> the constant shit he spews), but that in his obsession he even
> responds and comments on his own post without waiting for a reply.
> This way ac just multiplies his stupid noise on the group, as if there
> wasn't enough.
> --
> The Source For Premium Newsgroup Access
> Great Speed, Great Retention
> 1 GB/Day for only $8.95
doc
>>he even responds and comments on his own post without waiting for a reply.
lol .... this is the fourth of five of your posts - all sent within minutes
of each other .....
replying to unasked questions.
the voices must be very loud today ... did you forget your medication?
ac
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
|