| Re: ac complains of reposting, then reposts even sooner himself |
|
| ac (a@a.com) |
2007/06/26 16:52 |
Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:52:23 -0500
Message-ID: <4681989A.853E2B8E@a.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 23:52:10 +0100
From: ac <a@a.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en-gb]C-CCK-MCD (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.pantyhose
Subject: Re: ac complains of reposting, then reposts even sooner himself
References: <ms3ap2ttp8b8r0q9q47m0a079qccmgql4i@4ax.com> <pde283tis10er4e6fuqgk4dlfvtqhv6bhr@4ax.com> <46814284.3FF84230@a.com> <1jo283lefpvnoogb45ji1abv8alhs0dk16@4ax.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 260
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.155.78.139
X-AuthenticatedUsername: NoAuthUser
X-Trace: sv3-WzcWrrR0vbKVAifpu6EtZtIAXnPKhsu6CfuIoqWXDTXvAGeCqMWPffRh8IPbiuAEPprmOML1sjcjr/C!fi2IuRvskW2plPOAkmjQZzcqLzT+3KkSEhlHBfaAaIeDgzSqDgAaXA==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@btinternet.com
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@btinternet.com
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.35
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.pantyhose:3141
Doc wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:44:52 +0100, ac <a@a.com> wrote:
>
> >Doc wrote:
> >
> >> I may repost an mpeg after a few years, elongate or change the bitrate
> >> to a newer standard along the way (but the same film) and ac screams
> >> bloody murder that I "repost" (like no one ever reposted here, like
> >> his favorite posters, LOL!).
> >>
> >> But ac doesn't even believe in his own arguments since he has reposted
> >> an mpeg in less than 6 months, and unchanged, while whining about my
> >> reposts (and only my reposts) from 2004.
> >>
> >> On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 12:59:38 +0000, ac <ac@ac.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >For your delectation - "mature12_21.wmv" (000/185) 43.3 MBytes yEnc
> >> >ac
> >>
> >> Then on June 24, 2007, less than 6 months later, the exact same file
> >> is reposted:
> >>
> >> From: ac <ac@ac.com>
> >> Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 09:55:25 -0400
> >> >Subject: anyone have pantyhose mpegs? - "mature12_21.wmv" (*/185) 43.3 MBytes yEnc
> >>
> >> Normally a 6 month repost like that is not even flame worthy but it
> >> only goes to show that ac himself does not even believe the shit he
> >> constantly upchucks from his mouth. He whines about reposts from
> >> years ago, but reposts himself much much sooner.
> >> It's all bullshit, ac is just mad at me because he was rightfully
> >> smacked down 3 years ago and can't get over it.
> >>
> >> (Interestingly, the root of that initial problem was ac attacking Sam
> >> I'm and other posters for using "yenc", something he has done here
> >> with posting the old lady wmv file twice. He doesn't believe his own
> >> retarded arguments, he just spews crap hoping to score "points"
> >> against those that exposed him 3 years ago.
> >>
> >> AC, this stuff about 3 years ago, your rage and inability to move on,
> >> is the only thing that explains your dysfunctional behavior. You don't
> >> even believe in your own stupid lies and retarded arguments, you never
> >> did. Why don't you just get over it ac, and move on with your life?
> >> You'd rather hang out in the "senior" or "mature" newsgroup anyway. Be
> >> a man, ac, move on.
> >>
> >> --
> >> The Source For Premium Newsgroup Access
> >> Great Speed, Great Retention
> >> 1 GB/Day for only $8.95
> >
> >doc
> >
> >important stuff first
> >>>(Interestingly, the root of that initial problem was ac attacking Sam I'm
> >
> >Sam was (is) a good poster
>
> But ac fought with anyway. Sam left in disgust shortly thereafter.
>
> >If you look back in your archive ... you'll see that you have blamed my attacks
> >individually on
> >sam, stomp and posters in general
> >sam was a good old boy ...
> >stomp never posted anything in his life - (he ran away when I said I'd post 10 for 1 if
> >he'd post)
>
> AC ran a stupid flame war with stomp for months, and then restarted it
> after stomp returned after a break, obsessively cyber stalking in a
> manner similar to what ac later did to me for 3 years running.
>
> >posters in general ... I've never ever attacked except occasionally an odd spammer
> >.... oh and a very odd you.
>
> AC did not attack spammers when he got here, he never really cared
> about any of that, he only engaged in never ending threads and flame
> wars with long time regulars here. AC didn't even ever make a single
> negative comment about me until I intervened in his other months long
> running battles and told him to stop being an ass. After that, ac
> attached himself to me like horny dog trying to hump a leg, and every
> imaginable complaint was created or made up as he went along, like
> Ariana's foot "could" instead be my male foot etc.
>
> >if you really want to know where this started
> >Gandalf criticised a post of mine he considered as being too large.
> >(which makes as much sense to me still as complaining someone has given you too much
> >money.
>
> Okay, so maybe you flamed Gandalf back. But eventually a normal person
> would stop and just move on maybe after a day or 2. Going on a jihad
> makes no sense, ac.
>
> >Seems that the ignore if you no like viewpoint
> >and the mighty "kill file"
> >applies to everyone but him - and you when you figure out what he means)
> >
> >
> >Nice to see that you are still keeping the archive of our posts
> >Every time you refer to it I shit my pants in fear ...
>
> I gather ac doesn't like it when he is easily shown to be a hypocrite.
>
> >how and why you are so sick is between you and your other personalities.
>
> AC has suggested before that I'm also really other people in the
> group. AC suggests many things like Arian's foot was mine instead, and
> other things that he picks out of his ass at random.
>
> >But I have to say ... it creeps the hell out of me ...
> >however delusional I got ... I'd keep something like that to myself ... I certainly
> >wouldn't contradict gandalf, confirm it was true .... and then defend it!
> >even to have "only" kept the records for almost 6 months shows how fixated you are.
>
> LOL! "Fixated". Good word here. Except for one thing, I do not care
> about ac, but ac cares about me.
>
> >You tried this repost argument earlier today - so in answer to this repost .....(I
> >thought then you were being subtle) ... let me repeat ...
> >Yes - I tried to post this file sometime ago (I'll have to take your word for the date
> >... I don't count myself)
> >..... but the post failed - twice - thanks to my ISP ..
> >
> >so in reality (remember reality doc?) it was never actually posted in a playable format
>
> Nice try by ac, but what ac says is untrue (as it often is). AC had
> problems posting a different mpeg near that time. However the mpeg ac
> just reposted was posted before on Dec 29, 2006 with 36142 yenc lines,
> the precise number of lines as the repost. The file names and the
> line count are identical and the prior post was as successful as the
> last one.
> Again normally a 6 month repost would not even be an issue, but since
> ac has spent much of the past year screaming bloody murder about
> reposts (only mine) after a 3 year interval, his stupid hypocrisy had
> to be exposed. The truth is, no one cares about reposts after a long
> interval, indeed they help new people to the group, and ac doesn't
> really care about it either, but it was just something stupid ac made
> up to "get back" at me with.
>
> More tiresome (but sometimes funny) shit from ac below:
>
>
> >(That was back when mpg files weren't an issue with gandalf)
> >
> >I did promise to try again once the problems stopped
> >they did ... so I have
> >I notice you didn't jump on that bandwagon and support his lame attack on movie files -
> >
> >how disloyal of you ... you love it when he supports you!
>
> >As for yEnc - read the original spec ... yenc was intended to be used for large
> >multimedia files ...
> >what did I just post ... a large mm file ...
> >
> >actually we do agree on something ... jpgs should never be posted in yEnc format ...
> >However in your case it's because spam has never used a format that could in any way
> >restrict access ....
>
> I never agreed to this. Yenc is not a format anyway. The poster can
> post jpegs using yenc if he wants to. It's just up to the poster, not
> some newbie to the group in 2004 that was telling posters what to do
> (ac).
>
> >Despite going for the popular vote and supporting the yEncers (for points)
> >you refuse to use the format yourself - for spam!
> >(as an agent user you must know that yEnc is the default ...
> >so it was a conscious decision on your part)
>
> Yenc was not the default format for earlier versions of Agent that I
> used. I started with the first Agent versions, well before yenc was
> invented and just kept the settings the same with each upgrade.
> Everyone can decide to post as they want to, they don't need ac to
> arrive here in 2004 barking orders.
>
> >Your memory .... what are you like .....
> >now about ari02ny35a.jpg
> >you know - the nylon posts
> >
> >[Image]
> >
> >is it pantyhose or nylon?
> >
> >[Image]
>
> It "could" also be a "man" as says. It "could" perhaps also be the
> greatest mannequin ever made! LOL! And ac keeps hacking up and
> reposting the pic much more than anyone. Perhaps ac wants me to repost
> it again in unhacked up form so we can get the answer that he thinks I
> owe him. Nothing is owed to the troll but I may repost it in original
> form to vex him, along with additional pics of Ariana (to make sure
> she is isn't a man or that I used my man foot)
>
> >'cause if you look carefully you can see the same cute outline
> >and the dimple where the keep up band slightly digs in to the top of the thigh
> >(is that why they are called thigh highs?)
> >
> >Put us out of our misery doc ...
>
> AC, there are only 2 ways that your "misery" and obsession for me can
> be ended. Mere electroshock won't work. Short of killing yourself
> (foolproof method), a pre-frontal lobotomy might cure your obsession
> and resolve your anger and frustration.
>
> >answer the question .... not for me ... not for
> >gandalf
> >(he always seems to be wrong when he answers for you - which to makes it a safe bet
> >that they actually are nylons)
> >
> >do it for your doting public ... they must be consumed in anguish (both of them)
> >
> >ac
>
> There is no public here anymore, and your retarded rants will put
> anyone remaining fast asleep.
>
> So now Gandalf is not really me? AC has suggested before that we were
> the same.
> Perhaps Gandalf answered because he knows more than you (as he usually
> does).
> --
> The Source For Premium Newsgroup Access
> Great Speed, Great Retention
> 1 GB/Day for only $8.95
doc
there is a difference between line counts an playability ...
All the parts looked ok ... but there were a couple of complaints that the file wouldn't
play ... and it didn't
the next post the same happened
check the archive (shit that freaks me every time!)
the same post 1 possibly 2 days later
then a different 1 a couple of days after that ... failed again ... reposted with par files
... still wouldn't play
but doc the rest isn't worth answering ... you quote ... and then something completely
different is in the reply (but then on topic isn't something you know about)
>Your memory .... what are you like .....
>now about ari02ny35a.jpg
>you know - the nylon posts
>is it pantyhose or nylon?
It "could" also be a "man" as says. It "could" perhaps also be the ....
what sort of answer is that?
is the question so obscure?
does 02ny35a.jpg show pantyhose or nylon covered legs?
If you dared answer truthfully
I'd be gone tomorrow
but ..... your choice
I'm not going to try to justify ... that would be impossible
can't talk sense to the senseless
ac
|
|
|