Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Gandalf <gandalf@rivendell.bog>
Reply-To: newsgroup
Organization: is a sign of a sick and twisted mind.
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.pantyhose
Subject: Re: anyone have pantyhose mpegs?
References: <1625-467D8E94-244@storefull-3253.bay.webtv.net> <Cvjfi.295847$d22.223254@fe03.news.easynews.com> <467E7624.20193F1@a.com> <Ydwfi.146692$AX2.15469@fe04.news.easynews.com> <467EF1D2.2E720F89@a.com> <po3u73dgaskffhab1klscgk8jbeugr1hul@4ax.com> <467F71B1.7339E73B@a.com>
In-Reply-To: <467F71B1.7339E73B@a.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <vOYfi.337910$dg3.243125@fe10.news.easynews.com>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 00:09:00 GMT
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.pantyhose:3129
ac wrote:
> is she wearing pantyhose ... or nylons?
>
> simple question ... one of two words will answer it
>
> I notice gandalf couldn't figure out which one ...
>
> ac
Since I was never asked, nor did I ever offer my opinion, your
conclusion that I "couldn't figure out which one" is obviously coming
out of your ass like everything else you spew.
It's apparent to anyone that's ever seen non-sheer pantyhose [and that
know the difference between them and thigh-highs] that the model is
wearing pantyhose.
But you, having never seen a pair of pantyhose on anyone but yourself,
wouldn't know that.
Gee. That sounds like one of your conclusions.
You're really not worth this.
--
-Gandalf
Never meddle in the affairs of a dragon for you are crunchy and taste
good with ketchup!
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
|