On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 11:12:08 +0100, ac <a@a.com> wrote:
>Gandalf wrote:
>
>> ac wrote:
>>
>> > In england it's know as hash # in america typographically it's also hash
>> > abbreviation - ie telephone#
>> >
>> > below is a list of the more popular anglo/american glyphs.
>> >
>> > note .... in any language doc is still a looser
>>
>> Actually, hash is not its proper name either.
>> That's simply a popularized name such as pound and number.
>>
>> And it's loser, not looser.
>>
>> You just can't seem to get him off your mind.
>> Do you dream about him?
>>
>> How sad.
>>
>> --
>> -Gandalf
>>
>> Never meddle in the affairs of a dragon for you are crunchy and taste
>> good with ketchup!
>
>Gand
>
>For someone who didn't know the answer you sure talk big - if you don't know
>what it IS called .... how come you are so sure what it isn't?
>Or are you (predictably) just trying to sound superior and defend your
>
>wittw fwend.doc
>You were wrong about the archives ... why would I believe you this time?
>I see you now have the job of answering for doc - (seeing how he makes such a
>mess of it himself)
>
>This is a bit of a bad start though - don't you think?
>
>A friend who actually knows about these things tells me that as this glyph
>isn't actually used in any language ... and it was "invented" to fill a void
>in the (german) printing trade in the late 17th century.
>Hence the clouded definition and usage rules - The name is derived via
>"crosshatch" (originally engravers and artists created fonts ... so the term
>was in everyday use by them.)
>
>But don't believe me oh dragon fart - look at what it says:
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_sign
>
>You can see that like colour - color ... tyre ... tire
>it's been bastardised (or is that bastardized?) and adopted for many diverse
>uses
>so just like the "correct" English" spelling depends on which side of the pond
>you are on
>(why do they call it ENGLISH and not american I wonder?).
>so the "correct" name/useage varies .....
>
>How very provincial and egocentric of you not to consider that you - the fount
>of all knowledge - could be mistaken
>(doesn't work here either oh ketchup covered one!).
>and that your personal usage is the only "correct" option - even thought you
>had already said you didn't know.
>
>..... A little sad don't you think?
>
>And ok you got me lol .... I was so excited thinking about doc that my hand
>was shaking when I typed loser ...
>or maybe it is a freudian slip .... y' know like the football chant
>loooooooosssseeeeeeeeeeeer!
>Lucky is was only a small word or you'd have missed it ... then you'd have
>been in the diorea ..... sorry .... s**t
>(No one ever seems to be able to spell diarrhoea even when they talk it!)
>
>Just a thought .... given his consistently bad use of "big" words - when doc
>was told to bring a diorama to school ..... what do you reckon he had in the
>bag?
>Same as his posts - the last had ... excellent foliage ..good clouds ... I
>could almost hear the sound of running water .... shame there was no actual
>sign of pantyhose ... just an old bird flashing a bit of leg ...
>
>alt.landscapes - definitely ...... or alt.feet - possibly at a pinch
>but a pantyhose group ??????
>I don't see it myself
>
>spam is so rarely ever on topic .... is it?
>
>
>ac
More verbal diarrhea, just volumes of it, from the mouth of ac.
I posted 3 pics, 2 were pantyhosed leg shots, face not visible. Third
shot was waist up, to show the face, at the same outdoor location (ac
whines about the trees and clouds in the background), same outfit,
same girl. So ac claims the face shot is "off topic". He is a
retard. From the beginning when this group transformed into a pic
group no one has been so retarded so as to claim a face shot like that
would be "off topic". Indeed real off topic posts occur often in the
pantyhose groups but ac is not complaining. Indeed, he pushed off
topic crap and the "senior" group.
And it's all caused by ac's hurt feelings from 3 years ago when I put
his queer ass down for being an asshole with others here and
continuing months long flame wars with others here and telling
regulars what to do and how to do it after just arriving here himself.
A week long (or more) of complaints and nonsense about 1 face shot out
of 3 shots (legs not visible in the face shot)???
It's not rationally explainable. It can only be understood in the
context of a super obsessive nutcase, ac, who has been on a 3 year
jihad ever since I hurt his feelings in 2004.
Be a man ac, and get over it.
--
The Source For Premium Newsgroup Access
Great Speed, Great Retention
1 GB/Day for only $8.95
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
|