Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: John Locke <electric_chaos%%deletethis5%@cogeco.ca>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.pantyhose
Subject: Re: Pantyhose Regaining Footing After Losing Legs
References: <1167960678.858375.25580@i15g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <1167960678.858375.25580@i15g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <JqEnh.64076$Qm2.40624@read1.cgocable.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 22:10:42 -0500
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.150.107.119
X-Complaints-To: news@cogeco.net
X-Trace: read1.cgocable.net 1168053033 24.150.107.119 (Fri, 05 Jan 2007 22:10:33 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 22:10:33 EST
Organization: Cogeco Cable
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.pantyhose:2685
admin@ng2000.com wrote:
> foxnews.com/story/0,2933,240741,00.html
>
> (Fox News) That sheer hosiery has become less popular among American
> women since it peaked in the 1980s is a given, even among the
> gam-covering garments' most ardent supporters. But hose is creeping
> back up.
>
> ===
> Top 10 Pantyhose News Stories: http://www.ng2000.com/fw.php?tp=pantyhose
>
Let's hope it reagains it's legs. I dont' know why women wouldn't
want to wear them. Actaully, I don't myself really notice much of a
difference between now and 20 years ago.
jason
|
|