Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Doc <docREMOVEthis@it-smells.com>
Newsgroups: alt.pantyhose
Subject: Re: ohno44
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 14:19:03 -0400
Message-ID: <aph5a215p9va5ktik1vsvilqui464dqc1f@4ax.com>
References: <ox8og.2123$NP4.2087@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net> <YZWdnZzbKr6ClT_ZnZ2dnUVZ_v2dnZ2d@comcast.com> <AsSdne0bC4Gf6D_ZnZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 20
Organization: Unknown
X-Complaints-To: abuse@shared-secrets.com
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.pantyhose:2300
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 06:24:39 -0600, "Teaser \(the ONLY one\)"
<Teaser@optonline.net> wrote:
>
>"BoycottAI" <BoycottAI@BoycottAI.com> wrote in message
>news:YZWdnZzbKr6ClT_ZnZ2dnUVZ_v2dnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> OHNO more spam!
>
>
>you don't know the MEANING of the word SPAM.
>How is an ON topic pantyhose oic, posted to ONE group, SPAM?
>
And would it matter whether it was posted to 2 or 3 groups if on topic
to each?
It depends on how you define spam. What the original meanings were and
what has evolved on the groups, particularly this one, is quite
different. Nowdays people use that term simply to define any obnoxious
post (from being off topic or repeated ad infintum).
|
|