Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Doc <docREMOVEthis@it-smells.com>
Newsgroups: alt.pantyhose
Subject: Re: Can we please limit the plumper posts
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 18:06:31 -0400
Message-ID: <mu4m92h8dt10clrq3i5d1a8fg1k8b6uf38@4ax.com>
References: <97EAE0B97EA331A5E78@i09f1k4hbqc9p5g1sb3ceq> <s34m92dsn0lo1vccfv1ejkr1qeijdloj14@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 28
Organization: Unknown
X-Complaints-To: abuse@shared-secrets.com
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.pantyhose:2277
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 21:53:19 GMT, OU812 <b69tg493@hotmail.com> wrote:
>LOL I Hear ya LMAO is mine ok?????
>On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 22:05:28 +0100, Yokko <yokko@yokko.yokko> wrote:
>
>>I would like to ask posters to limit the number of plumper posts to
>>alt.pantyhose and to other pantyhose groups.
>>
>>You may call them BBW or full figure or even sometimes call them
>>mature. But the fact is that these are pictures of what are
>>eseentially fat swine and the pictures have litle or no place in a
>>group whose pix are supposed to stimulate the viewer.
>>
>>So could plumper posters please severely limit the offensive dross
>>they post.
>>
>>I don't care if your wife looks like a fat pig even when she is
>>wearing pantyhose, we simply do not have any need to see pictures of
>>how awful she is.
>>
>>Thank you.
OA812, your post was nice.
I'm venturing a guess that he may have been speaking about some other
posts instead.
|
|