alt.pantyhosePrev. Next
Re: Old PH CD found - - "gj_fet_phtkl066.jpg" yEnc (1/1) [88K] Unknown
Doc (docREMOVEthis@it-smells.com) 2006/06/06 13:41

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Doc <docREMOVEthis@it-smells.com>
Newsgroups: alt.pantyhose
Subject: Re: Old PH CD found - - "gj_fet_phtkl066.jpg" yEnc (1/1) [88K]
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 15:41:58 -0400
Message-ID: <t8mb821jrv5v5jahf0c29foe0b16ntojev@4ax.com>
References: <15418HW.C0AA112D002D308BF0284530@news.giganews.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 10
Organization: Unknown
X-Complaints-To: abuse@shared-secrets.com
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.pantyhose:2224

This girl is a real honest to goodness beauty.  This is rare.  She has
a minimum of make-up on and she still looks very very good.  So many
you see have make-up literally slathered on pancake style, and it
fools the average jow thinking the woman is a "model".  But if you saw
some of them more naturally (or without photoshop "make-up" too), they
would be downright scary.
This woman is an exception. A real beauty.
Not a "barbie" doll. Not fake. And the distinction between "amateur"
and "professional" is pure bullshit in a certain sense - it either
looks good or it does not - Doc

Next Prev. Article List         Favorite