Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: ac <a@a.com>
Newsgroups: alt.pantyhose
Subject: Re: <this upset ac - (rep) - ad nausium> Tyler O' returns in reinf.
toe - Ty504phf14d.jpg
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 18:22:13 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: BT Openworld
Lines: 163
Message-ID: <42704195.52CFD048@a.com>
References: <k8a071tcqcb0hgvjscqaua6rb4s94s4hd6@4ax.com> <d4qj67$72q$1@nwrdmz02.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com> <5tr171pv18nv2uc2uit6slpedsq9flpqh1@4ax.com> <427003F4.D84FDD3B@a.com> <Xns9647A1E24A7FEsamim@216.196.109.144>
NNTP-Posting-Host: host81-134-200-142.in-addr.btopenworld.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: nwrdmz03.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com 1114798933 5640 81.134.200.142 (29 Apr 2005 18:22:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news-complaints@lists.btinternet.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 18:22:13 +0000 (UTC)
X-Accept-Language: en
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en-gb]C-CCK-MCD (Win98; U)
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.pantyhose:180
Sam
You're probably the only one who thinks I'm not a true troll, yet.....
So your judgement is probably a little questionable ;-)
I can understand and respect your loyalty.
So I won't try to justify anything or use this reply to create any
cross-fire.
I've stated my case - you've given a honest considered and reasonable reply -
so as you say
>>there's no need for further discussion about this.
I've always said - Posters rule - and you are the first real poster to
comment.
I'd love to stay longer - but your vote does count .... so ... I'm gone
.....
Keep posting .... your stuff is always worth the time
Take care
ac
Sam I'm wrote:
> ac wrote in news:427003F4.D84FDD3B@a.com
>
> > DVD/DC
> >
> > You have a slim grasp of the truth and reality as you display every
> time
> > you try to divert attention from yourself.
> > I think you are the last person to talk about liars....
> >
> > DC - may have a prettier mouth than a $5 dollar whore - but I'm unsure
> > what point he was trying to make - other than he can post longer and
> > more irrelevant replies (even) than mine.. (no salt on the fries DC)
> >
> > The subject has never been changed by me....
> > I still say you are spamming the group and use it only to advertise
> your
> > business.
> >
> > I won't start a tirade which begins .... I know your type you are a
> > .....
> > because we all know that that is just a tactic to obscure the main
> issue
> > and to introduce irrelevant crap which doesn't need proof or
> foundation.
> >
> > I'll repeat my point for the benefit of you and DC seeing that neither
> > of you seem unable to grasp what it is.
> >
> > You are spamming the group by using it exclusively to advertise your
> > business
> >
> > plain enough now?
> >
> > In most justice systems around the world (excluding perhaps Gadaffi,
> > Pol-Pot and the like) there is generally more priority given to proving
> > or disproving an allegation i.e. "YOU dvd are a spammer who advertises
> > his business in this and other groups".
> >
> >>>>I doubt seriously he has a lot of friends or social contacts in the
> > real world.
> > (In reality I'd have thought that the "regulars" were the real social
> > outcasts ...
> > They certainly seem to have an abundance of spare time and it's
> > difficult to surf when you're visiting friends (or so I find)).
> > I can't remember when I saw "Serial killer acquitted because he has
> some
> > nice friends, writes very nice letters and a divine wardrobe!!"
> > in the news. (maybe in wayne state?)
> >
> > Just as you are finding - Its difficult to prove your popularity
> > especially in the groups - (is it 4 or 5 now - including yourself?)
> > The size of your social circle, or the size of your pay packet is
> surely
> > irrelevant here
> > (or are you trying to introduce a class system? .... actually from what
> > you've said I think you are)
> > surely the statement "I count more than anyone else" is a statement of
> > your estimation of your worth?
> >>>>watch us all fall in awe.
> >
> > It certainly seems to irk you more that I DARE to question one of your
> > standing rather than WHAT I'm questioning.
> > The only criterion I imagine the majority use here is the number and
> > quality of a person's posts.
> >
> > For most, to prove if they own a business or are unemployed is
> > impossible in an environment which is almost exclusively anonymous.
> > For you however that's the easy one ... you prove that your business
> > exists with every post you make.
> >
> > Prove to the group (not me) that you are worth a second glance.
> > Show that I'm wrong - and not by criticising my writing style, IQ or
> the
> > colour of my shirt.
> >
> > DC could help you - he's published - and debated at Wayne State (is
> that
> > "at" or "with" wayne?). - so he's the genius ... not me.
> >
> > His impeccable syntax should ensure a humiliating victory over me
> > It should be easy .....
> >
> > I promise the whole group that I'll vanish as soon as you do.
> > However little you rate them .... they're the ones.
> >
> > ac
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > DVD Doc wrote:
> >
> >> You just lied again. Your first post complained it was off topic as
> >> it was a head shot. You are a time waster seeking to shift to a new
> >> argument as you lose them.
> >>
> >> Troll, liar, time waster = ac.
> >
> >
>
> AC, it's only by your own narrow definition of spam that you call DVD Doc
> a spammer, we are all aware now of your point in this matter, there's no
> need for further discussion about this.
>
> For what it comes to DVD Doc, he is a contributing poster in this group,
> whether it's his adverts about updates on his site or just general
> discussion about models posted here or other topics related to pantyhose
> and he has been that for several years, maybe even as long as I have, and
> he also is respected not only by regular posters but also regular lurkers
> in this group because he is considered as a reliable source of
> information related to pantyhose stuff.
> DVD Doc has never had any negative feedback about his posts except from
> you, Queen of Scotland and couple others well known trolls, who by the
> way seem to have vanished with AOL, personally I don't miss any of them,
> they seemed to have something against me too from time to time. ;-)
>
> You have already shown tendency to become a troll, although you don't yet
> qualify as such, but you have chosen a path that leads that way.
>
> It would be greater loss for this group if DVD Doc would stop posting
> than if you would vanish.
>
> --
> best regards
>
> Sam I'm
|
|
 - ad nausium> Tyler O' returns in reinf. toe - Ty504phf14d.jpg')){kind=link}