Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.pantyhose
Subject: Re: Repost of some of scribbles posts. But enlarged. - Scribble_Altered01.jpg (1/1) [171K]
From: SnoBaton <seeREPLY-TOheader@dummy.dummy>
References: <0001HW.BFD0561F035B7768F0407550@netnews.bresnan.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 20:54:52 GMT
Message-ID: <9734D4C136801A5E78@i09f1k4hbqc9p5g1sb3ceq>
News-Agent: OE 6.00.2800
X-No-Archive: yes
Reply-To: snowbatonDOH-DOH-DOH@yaDEE-DEE-DEEhoo.com.au
Lines: 13
Organization: Octanews
NNTP-Posting-Date: 22 Dec 2005 14:54:52 CST
X-Complaints-To: abuse@octanews.net
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.pantyhose:1612
> User-Agent: Hogwasher/3.1 (Carbon/OSX)
> X-Complaints-To: abuse@bresnan.net
> Message-ID: <0001HW.BFD0561F035B7768F0407550@netnews.bresnan.net>
> From: NoiD <N0@identity.com>
Newsgroups: alt.pantyhose
I may be missing something here but if you enlarge the pix then isn't
that the same as my jpeg viewer enlarging them automatically.
I am not gaining quality if you enlarge them, am I?
I think there is probably no need to post enlarged pix.
|
|
 [171K]')){kind=link}