Take it easy Dex. Don't get yourself all worked up. I re-read your post
and I'm pretty sure your comments implied imperfections. To me,
imperfections in this context would be blemishes and stuff that most
professional sites would airbrush out. I didn't catch that you were
implying the pantyhose were airbrushed on. If that's the case, then they're
doing a great job of it! Fooled me!! As for Angel, my personal opinion
still stands. I would think that a professional photographer would not
shoot her so that her extra large nostrils are so prominent in the
photographs. She can't help it of course, and obviously I'm in the minority
here because she seems to be very popular with most of you. She certainly
has an amazing body, and pretty feet. I just can't get past the Judd Nelson
thing. BTW, I am a professional photographer, and I agree with your
statement that the quality of the images are very good, as are most of
Dawn's, Lycra Pavel, NLP, and others. but they ALL touch up the photos.
That's what separates the pro's from the hacks.
My comments about blemishes was a general statement, I"m not sure how you
interpreted it to be a slam against Dawn personally. She is very cute, has
a great body, and between her and her friend Honey, she has an amazingly hot
site. But if she were to cave into your desires and stop airbrushing, the
quality of the images would suffer in my opinion, and I'm sure she would
agree.
As for your crushing news that Dawn or Angel will never date me, I'm not
sure how I will ever get over that. Perhaps my grip of reality will carry
me through. Anyway, these girls have to have a thick skin if they're going
to present themselves in a public forum, and lonely spankers like you should
not take being called a fuck so seriously either. Obviously I don't know a
thing about you. You're probably a nice guy. And who's to say I didn't
intend "you fucks" as a term of endearment? OK, you got me there, I meant
it as a slam. But hey, it's the holiday season, so let's just say we both
disagree and if I offended you, Dawn, or Jud, please accept my apologies.
"Dex" <dexterious001NOSPAM@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:0001HW.BFC7C9AA001C2439F0407550@news.dallas.sbcglobal.net...
> Oh...sorry...I guess since I'm a "fuck", I didn't realize that these
> airbrushed women were the only women you actually get personal with in
> pantyhose. My mistake.
>
> If you actually look at the photos, you'll see that the PANTYHOSE are
> actually airbrushed. There are no "bruises and pimples" showing on the a
> side
> shot, or a leg shot....so........there's no need to airbrush the actual
> pantyhose. Common sense, really.
>
> Also, you're the second genius who thinks you're complimenting Dawn by
> telling her she has bruises and pimples. Way to go, "Hawkins".
>
> I'm not insulting Dawn. I obviously like her pictures until she makes them
> look fake. Nothing wrong with voicing an opinion without insulting other
> newsgroup users.
>
> And by the way, any professional photographer will tell you, Angel's
> pictures
> are probably the best quality on the web. And she's Dawn's friend...so
> you're
> insulting both of them. Nice. You blew it fantasy boy. Now they're NEVER
> going to date you!
>
> Hahahahahahaha...I kid...I kid............or do I?
>
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 18:47:02 -0600, not_me wrote
> (in article <I7oof.12703$vx.11990@fed1read01>):
>
>> Pantyhose Angle looks like Judd Nelson in drag. Dawn, don't listen to
>> these
>> fucks. Keep the airbrushing. It's all about fantasy. Bruises and
>> pimples
>> may be "keeping it real", but it damn sure isn't sexy......
>>
>> "Dex" <dexterious001NOSPAM@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:0001HW.BFC67C28001D1415F0407550@news.dallas.sbcglobal.net...
>>> Well, that's why none of these sites get any of my money. What's the big
>>> deal
>>> with airbrushing? What are they hiding? Imperfections? None of those
>>> girls
>>> are on Dawn's site or Izzy's site are perfect. None of them are perfect
>>> tens.
>>> Some are attractive(some alot more than others) but, none of them are
>>> drop
>>> dead gorgeous. Can anyone point out one of these pantyhose queens that
>>> IS
>>> perfect?
>>>
>>> I've been with scores of girls IN pantyhose better looking than anyone
>>> on
>>> Izzy's or Dawn's site. Doesn't mean I still don't like looking at
>>> pictures
>>> of women in hosiery.
>>>
>>> Dawn...you're pretty...cute...sexy...love you in hose...but, you'll
>>> never
>>> be
>>> perfect(whatever that is.) Just keep it "real". Stop airbrushing. We
>>> want
>>> to
>>> see you and your girls pantyhose; not Photoshop airbrush work. Take some
>>> notes from Pantyhose Angel. Her photos are perfect....and guess
>>> what...she's
>>> not.
>>>
>>> -Dex
>>>
>>> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 03:19:21 -0600, BoycottAI wrote
>>> (in article <me2dnUs4sLQHfgLeRVn-qA@comcast.com>):
>>>
>>>> They wont because their desire to be perfect overwhelms them.
>>>>
>>>> They take a few pics, comments go to their head and before you know it
>>>> they
>>>> all end up like Izzy.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Dex" <dexterious001NOSPAM@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:0001HW.BFC52662000730D9F0407550@news.dallas.sbcglobal.net...
>>>>> You really need to tell your photo guy to stop airbrushing the photos.
>>>>> It
>>>>> doesn't make them look better. It makes them look fake. You and your
>>>>> girls
>>>>> look fine the way you are. It's the imperfections that made it more
>>>> "real".
>>>>> Please...please...stop the airbrushing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you...
>>>>>
>>>>> -Dex
>>>>> dexterious001@yahoo.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
|
|