Stomp this really isn't just for you.
I hadn't realised at the time of the last post but Sam I'm is currently posting in
a.b.nospam.plumpers .... as is sense fan
everyone - draw your own conclusions
>>if I was to be a good poster I wouldn't post them here but then again this group has
>>always been an odd ball.
Two points .... yes this is an odd group .... no one has ever complained about on-topic movies
(as far as I remember)
And so far as this group is concerned - you're not any kind of a poster.
'cmon - I will if you will.
And don't get too tied up with RAR/Par .... if you only posting a smallish clip .... don't
bother ... just post and let your reader do the splitting
ac
Stomp@here.ca wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 13:03:35 +0000 (UTC), ac <a@a.com> wrote:
>
> >Stomp
> >
> >You're just too clever for me - how do you post a full movie without splitting?
>
> Fortunately because it is frowned upon it is isn't a regular thing but
> it is not all that uncommon to have people posting 700MB movie
> captures. Haven't seen anyone try a DVD yet but no doubt it has
> happened however lots of people sitll post 50 - 400MB files as one
> single upload. If you have a good enough link and upload to GigaNews
> or EasyNews it isn't beyond the pale that it will work but good luck
> with it propagating properly, plus many services won't accept NNTP
> posts larger than 10MB so in those cases you're really using the
> Premium Servers as shared FTP sites.
>
> >>>>That doesn't exactly make sense because jbralt was posting his own
> >>>>amateur material was he not? Who would attempt to 'force him' to
> >>>>stop? As per the others you are lost in the details. Very little of
> >>>>these issues are resolved via litigation. It never goes that far but
> >>>>it does form the basis for all sorts of posting losses.
> >
> >The "experts" in this group who "persuaded" him to stop.
> >If I remember correctly some of the "advice" offered was that;
> >models too fat/ugly
> >house too untidy (I ask you!)
> >Format too large
> >{{{{barf!}}}}
>
> Well I am speaking of NNTP not just this group. There will always be
> content complaints so nothing much to be done with that. Originally
> this group posted 90% amateur and 10% professional, (there just wasn't
> that much pantyhose material... heck there wasn't that much material
> at all, 10 pics was a banner day), and you had pretty much the same
> set of complaints from people expecting all the women to look like
> models. Now the ratio is probably 2% amateur and 98% professional and
> the same complaints abound.
>
> I don't think we can apply 'that kind of expert advice' as technical
> though? Also one has to be careful in confusing a poster's motivation
> for calling it quits. SamIAm posted thousands of pics, speaking from
> experience you do occassionally get tired of it and sometimes a
> nothing remark offers a perfect chance to walk away.
>
> >I don't claim to be a poster ..... however as you post to a multimedia group with
> >technology we can only dream of ...... why not yEnc a few here as well (I'm sure even the
> >GIFs would be well received)?
>
> >If you've lurked here since the beginning ... you must have some impressive examples.
> >Failing that ... a few movie caps
>
> Well first of all this is actually a text group so if I was to be a
> good poster I wouldn't post them here but then again this group has
> always been an odd ball. I suppose X-post to binaries.pics and
> multimedia would be in order as well.
>
> What I had planned to do a while ago but haven't gotten around to it
> yet was put together a 'best of' from some of the various PH related
> material and clips I've come across. I recognize that many people
> aren't in a position to download the 4GB DVD of Au Pair Girls just for
> the sake of the two scenes providing 10 minutes worth of Astrid Frank
> stripping down to her sheer to the waist so I'd have to bring out the
> video snippers in many cases.
>
> Of course most of those posts will still require spanning so one can
> only imagine the complaints once people see RAR/PAR encapsulated in
> yEnc.
>
> Stomp
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
|