Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: quid pro quo <zapp@costa.com>
Newsgroups: alt.multimedia.tk
Subject: Re: MR. HARE
Message-ID: <fkctg0pp23p1324s62e4r9pq0fgebh1rub@4ax.com>
References: <20040801165716.07086.00000224@mb-m17.aol.com> <20040801170541.16633.00001627@mb-m22.aol.com> <mlirg01fqln8qj80gh0uv2imvunl1ehl4o@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.640
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 11
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 16:35:05 EST
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 17:32:40 -0400
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.multimedia.tk:2171
On Mon, 02 Aug 2004 01:04:47 -0400, Poster <poster@mutemail.com>
wrote:
>mr. hare: taking away the word GAY, could you post your
>conceptions of what mutually orientation-applicable "erotic tickling"
>content would generically contain? you know that i have no expertise
>in this area <<frown>>, especially related to anything distinctly
>homosexual !!
Oh no, you certainly aren't homosexually inclined, you're just a
casual fan of male to male tickling; we all understand that!
|
|