On 30 May 2004 15:27:41 GMT, jamestwils00@aol.com (JamesTWils00)
wrote:
>is it homo m/m or what clearly label if you would
m/m is m/m; i'm not getting into an m/m "homo" thing
on a regular basis. that particular series is not, nor is
99.44% of my m/m - type materials. but, m/m is m/m;
f/m is f/m.
|
|