alt.languages.englishPrev. Next
Re: involvment in or involment at? Very little. Maybe some ..
Miss Elaine Eos (Misc@*your-shoes*PlayNaked.com) 2005/07/17 22:20

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Miss Elaine Eos <Misc@*your-shoes*PlayNaked.com>
Newsgroups: alt.languages.english
Subject: Re: involvment in or involment at?
Organization: Very little. Maybe some on weekends.
References: <J%xCe.3695$B6.105867@twister1.libero.it>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.4 (PPC Mac OS X)
Message-ID: <Misc-232344.21205717072005@newssvr14-ext.news.prodigy.com>
Lines: 21
NNTP-Posting-Host: 4.246.39.129
X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net
X-Trace: newssvr14.news.prodigy.com 1121660455 ST000 4.246.39.129 (Mon, 18 Jul 2005 00:20:55 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 00:20:55 EDT
X-UserInfo1: FKPO@SZEGJW]BW\[\RONOPDAUSXB@DTMNHWB_EYLJZ]BGIELK^RAQFW[ML\THRCKV^GGZKJMGV^^_JSCFFUA_QXFGVSCYRPILH]TRVKC^LSN@DX_HCAFX__@J\DAJBVMY\ZWZCZLPA^MVH_P@\\EOMW\YSXHG__IJQY_@M[A[[AXQ_XDSTAR]\PG]NVAQUVM
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 04:20:55 GMT
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.languages.english:896

In article <J%xCe.3695$B6.105867@twister1.libero.it>,
 "Giuseppe" <cames@hotmail.it> wrote:

> On a website about south pole exploration I found the following bit:
>
> "The history of our involvement at the South Pole dates back to the early
> years of the 20th century."
> (http://205.174.118.254/nspt/explore/hstory01.htm)
>
> What is the right way to say : involvment in or involment at?

Our involvement at the South Pole dates back nearly 20 years.

Our involvement in the South Pole project dates back 30 years.

Our involvement with Nancy... well, we don't like to talk about that ;)

--
Please take off your shoes before arriving at my in-box.
I will not, no matter how "good" the deal, patronise any business which sends
unsolicited commercial e-mail or that advertises in discussion newsgroups.

Follow-ups:123456789
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite