Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "credoquaabsurdum" <credoquaabsurdum@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: alt.languages.english
Subject: Re: involvment in or involment at?
Date: 17 Jul 2005 16:20:42 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <1121642442.254160.171790@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
References: <J%xCe.3695$B6.105867@twister1.libero.it>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.205.240.114
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1121642448 22835 127.0.0.1 (17 Jul 2005 23:20:48 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 23:20:48 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <J%xCe.3695$B6.105867@twister1.libero.it>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=212.205.240.114;
posting-account=GZZa0w0AAADoATjy0fPIWxXr6_YULlMz
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.languages.english:893
I believe that you should try to read more simplifed texts at your
level, however, before you really spread your wings and go for
something like this.
Giuseppe wrote:
> On a website about south pole exploration I found the following bit:
>
> "The history of our involvement at the South Pole dates back to the early
> years of the 20th century."
> (http://205.174.118.254/nspt/explore/hstory01.htm)
>
> What is the right way to say : involvment in or involment at?
>
> The history is very interesting to me, so do you think that the text is
> written in a correct english and can I relay on it to improve my english?
> Thank you!
>
>
> --
>
> Giuseppe
|
|