alt.languages.englishPrev. Next
Re: used to None
Bob Cunningham (exw6sxq@earthlink.net) 2005/07/04 18:40

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Bob Cunningham <exw6sxq@earthlink.net>
Newsgroups: alt.languages.english
Subject: Re: used to
Organization: None
Message-ID: <pskjc1hpl89ib7cn6mq3p6rf60lrj372lt@4ax.com>
References: <1120427607.208666.126580@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <slrndcitiq.rrd.chris@ccserver.keris.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 15
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 00:40:00 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.133.202.94
X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net
X-Trace: newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net 1120524000 66.133.202.94 (Mon, 04 Jul 2005 17:40:00 PDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2005 17:40:00 PDT
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.languages.english:820

On Mon, 4 Jul 2005 18:48:11 +0100, Chris Croughton
<chris@keristor.net> said:

> I don't believe "usedn't" is a word in English at all <g>.

But it is.

It's in _Merriam-Webster's Unabridged Dictionary_:

     Main Entry: usedn't
     Variant:or usen't [...]
     chiefly Britain   : used not

Not that I, for one, would ever say it.


Follow-ups:123456789101112131415161718192021222324
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite