Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 08:24:39 +0000
From: Richard Polhill <richard.news@polhill.vispa.invalid>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050317 Thunderbird/1.0.2 Mnenhy/0.7.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.languages.english
Subject: Re: English Lesson: Monty Python
References: <1171880766.368898.123930@k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <12tjb8ulg75721c@corp.supernews.com> <1172433325.262073.133690@k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <12u4aicoc8rg8e9@corp.supernews.com> <1172494889.539323.111830@z35g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <12u8slthotu2012@corp.supernews.com> <1172641122.371147.209670@k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <12ua5si8903og4b@corp.supernews.com> <54lkrsF216qpuU1@mid.individual.net>
In-Reply-To: <54lkrsF216qpuU1@mid.individual.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <3bcff$45e68c63$3e18e6cb$9867@news.vispa.com>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@vispa.net
Organization: Vispa
Lines: 19
NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.24.230.203 (62.24.230.203)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 08:18:43 +0000
X-Trace: 3bcff45e68c639bbd436e09867
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.languages.english:1432
Einde O'Callaghan wrote:
> There is nothing innately ungrammatical about split infinitives in
> English. They can be found in numerous writers from the time of Chaucer
> onwards. they only started to be frowned on when some bright sparks who
> thought that English grammar should be like Latin grammar (a radically
> different language) came up with the idea that because you couldn't
> split an infinitive in latin (not surprising since latin infinitives are
> always one word) this should also be the case in English.
> In my opinion, complaints about split infinitives are the province of
> pedants.
Hear, hear Einde.
Illiterate pedants, perhaps?
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
|