Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Dan" <DELETEMEdan_slaughter@sbcglobal.net>
Newsgroups: alt.languages.english
Subject: What you you think?
Lines: 7
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869
Message-ID: <Oc3ng.55921$Lm5.23150@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.224.39.3
X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net
X-Trace: newssvr12.news.prodigy.com 1151123374 ST000 70.224.39.3 (Sat, 24 Jun 2006 00:29:34 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 00:29:34 EDT
Organization: SBC http://yahoo.sbc.com
X-UserInfo1: [[PGG\CE[ZYUCPLY[ZJTO\@@GJT@QDDMEPWXODMMHXMTWA]EPMVOPCWZBL[\YUWHANGYZEFNHFZPNLOBUNSS^_LGEVWEY\PHO@YJSSWBBDT\PFD^ESBTXVCCMTD]JCJLE\_IJMFNRY]SWE[S[D_CNB__ZK^VGVCKHA[S@COB^[@ZQSDFQ\BPMS@DZVUKQTJL
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 04:29:34 GMT
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.languages.english:1253
Is "extremely capable" a conflict of terms? I think it is. Capable means,
at least to me, fully able. I don't think one can be more than full. What
about "exceedingly able?"
Dan
|
|