Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
Reply-To: "www.casino-folk.com" <info@casino-folk.com>
From: "www.casino-folk.com" <info@casino-folk.com>
Newsgroups: alt.gambling
Subject: Twelve vs. two-up in blackjack; more is sometimes less
Lines: 17
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
Message-ID: <fuLAd.26179$nV.934881@news20.bellglobal.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 23:30:06 -0500
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.71.101.34
X-Complaints-To: abuse@sympatico.ca
X-Trace: news20.bellglobal.com 1104380939 67.71.101.34 (Wed, 29 Dec 2004 23:28:59 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 23:28:59 EST
Organization: Bell Sympatico
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.gambling:872
Twelve vs. two-up in blackjack; more is sometimes less
(By Alan Krigman For At The Shore)
Don't you really hate it in blackjack when you get a 12 versus a dealer's
two-up? Still, it's not the worst hand you can get.
Played "by the book," hitting the 12, the outcome balances out to a loss of
just over $0.25 per dollar bet. Lots of player-dealer combinations are far
more taxing.....
Full article :
http://www.casino-folk.com/archives/2004/12/29/twelve-vs-two-up-in-blackjack-more-is-sometimes-less/
-----------------------
www.casino-folk.com - offers thoughts and facts about gambling.
|
|