alt.gamblingPrev. Next
Re: Question for Pro-Life Wingnuts http://groups.google.com
fffurken (fffurken@hotmail.com) 2012/02/04 07:45

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: fffurken <fffurken@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.gambling
Subject: Re: Question for Pro-Life Wingnuts
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 06:45:51 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <4da029bb-229d-4ae9-afd0-1f3ae9488266@j15g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
References: <1a4c55b9-2323-4ecb-9d70-255d04ce66d6@l14g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>
 <8788df17-3457-49b9-896a-7adb946fa497@14g2000vbw.googlegroups.com>
 <69998681-2e25-46ae-82c5-a8177668970e@b23g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
 <7fffdd49-995e-4c85-ae05-c0621b1644b6@do4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
 <a7OVq.5277$E07.2262@newsfe10.iad> <0erhi7pn1o6avtvdnut0v05b3o0u75r4v2@4ax.com>
 <Sc8Wq.7491$JN6.7126@newsfe13.iad> <f6kki7peaf6ejvgd1o8o4tdu39pinldirr@4ax.com>
 <BYEWq.2887$_q4.1625@newsfe21.iad> <om4ni79kkfo18rnarbrkl2jtjgqd11q3bf@4ax.com>
 <UjYWq.15607$%17.11280@newsfe06.iad> <a7e16987-a0f7-4b72-b64f-56acd1b5afae@kn4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
 <712d0431-0fc3-4ed4-bf17-3f8471aa269d@c21g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> <a64efa84-4dff-496a-a0ab-7d6a04e82981@kg1g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.44.59.30
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1328366751 5608 127.0.0.1 (4 Feb 2012 14:45:51 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 14:45:51 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: j15g2000yqb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.44.59.30; posting-account=ooQ2cwkAAAD5fHesw79EWxuj2WdLyA1Z
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client: true
X-Google-Header-Order: ARLUEHNKC
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1;
 Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152;
 .NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe)
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.gambling:4360



> > > > This debate should be about the rights of women.
>

o
> > > kill a full-grown adult
>
> > Eh, are you missing something Paul?
>
> > Do they have a "full-grown adult" in their own belly?
>

> be guilty of murder?

He or she probably wouldn't make it to trial.



I really have no idea what you think I was "trying". I also have no
idea what point you thought you were making by saying a woman does not
have a right to kill a full grown adult. Duh!

Follow-ups:12
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite