"popinjay999" <paulpopinjay@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:01fbd3f2-2272-4232-b277-f2d4ad96f09b@i10g2000pbl.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 26, 7:08 pm, "Clave" <clav...@the.monastery.com> wrote:
>
> Right -- that's all unions exist for is to make demands so unreasonable
> that
> no one makes any money.
>
> Idiot.
You must have missed where I asked about property rights, fuckface?
What about principle? I know that is probably a foreign concept to a
scumbag like you. What if it is YOUR business? Do you like someone
DEMANDING of you and TELLING you how to run YOUR BUSINESS? It's YOUR
PROPERTY!
And by the way, the scenario that you just denied ever exists, are you
trying to say unions have NEVER been so "unreasonable" that they PRICE
themselves right out of a job?
Who's the idiot now, bigger-idiot?
________________________________
Well, I don't think that I can answer that question just yet, paul. No one
ever suggested that anyone can interfere with the property rights of the
owner. It's just that if the owner wants his property to be productive
through the labor of other humans, then he has to pay those humans not
whatever he wants, but close to what they want. Or not. Why do you accept
hard-edged business negotiations in almost all contexts, except when it
comes to workers vs. management?
|
|