Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: damionclaymore@hotmail.com (Damion)
Newsgroups: alt.gambling
Subject: Re: Can someone run a software test on this bet strategy for me please?
Date: 17 Nov 2003 06:32:08 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <6e226e85.0311170632.13d4c10b@posting.google.com>
References: <6e226e85.0311141316.4ff57a1e@posting.google.com> <3FB6C8FE.5010204@blah.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.48.42.10
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1069079529 28823 127.0.0.1 (17 Nov 2003 14:32:09 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 14:32:09 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.gambling:213
Joe <blah@blah.com> wrote in message news:<3FB6C8FE.5010204@blah.com>...
> Damion wrote:
> > Use on unit on the numbers;
> > 0,28,9,26,30,11,7,20,32,17,5,22,34,15,3,24,36,13,1,00.
> > Please give me info on how many times it whens in 38 spins, 47, and
> > some really high amount like 10000 or more. Also give me the total
> > amount it would win lose.
> >
> > Damion
>
> Your 20 numbers will win an average of 20 times in each session of 38
> spins. Your average loss with 1 unit on each number will be 40 units
> every 38 spins (this loss is the house edge taking its toll).
> Of course with the law of deviation kept in mind, your
> 20 numbers will sometimes win more than 20 or less than 20 times in each
> 38 spins.
>
> Many systems have been devised around waiting until a group of
> numbers have won less than their expected in a given number of spins
> and then betting on them to win more than expected in the next session
> of spins. The fallacy with this method is that wheels or RNG's have no
> memory of past spins so they quite often dont balance things out soon
> enough.
>
> Hope i helped you :-)
Thanks Joe
|
|