Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: A Tan <adrian.tan@eezenet.com>
Newsgroups: alt.gambling
Subject: Re: Roulette Systems questions
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 15:57:44 +0800
Organization: Subscriber of Pacific Internet
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <r7e6rv4pjv3amrp9nbqlnp944liar28n1h@4ax.com>
References: <6e226e85.0311120953.3cd9492e@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl243.dyn255.pacific.net.sg
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: nobel.pacific.net.sg 1068710265 17092 210.24.255.243 (13 Nov 2003 07:57:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@pacific.net.sg
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 07:57:45 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) trialware
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.gambling:204
I wouldn't believe the RNG will do any systems any good. If you may
have noticed that in the casions, different croupier will have
different style of spinning. Take for example, I went once to a casino
in UK, and I was just standing for 30 mins, and I actually found a
pattern of numbers that kept coming out, because she was new, and an
was, raking in the profits! After a few more rounds, she was changed
immediately!
>
>I understand that the reason why you would use random number
>generators to evaluate a roulette system is because it allows you to
>do it quickly and with out spending money. But as far as I remember
>from software classes software RNG aren't completely random, only
>hardware RNG are. Which skews the results of the test. Does that fact
>just not matter?
>
|
|