Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: " johno" <anon@zfree.co.nz>
Newsgroups: alt.gambling
Subject: Roulette - not what is appears
Lines: 68
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.220.96.59
Message-ID: <3f84ce68@news.comindico.com.au>
X-Original-Trace: 9 Oct 2003 12:56:40 +1000, 203.220.96.59
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 02:56:43 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.194.27.1
X-Complaints-To: abuse@comindico.com.au
X-Trace: news.optus.net.au 1065668203 203.194.27.1 (Thu, 09 Oct 2003 12:56:43 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 12:56:43 EST
Organization: Comindico Australia - reports relating to abuse should be sent to abuse@comindico.com.au
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.gambling:137
I would like to share albeit a small part of my experiences with the game of
Roulette played in down under over the last 5 years. I first started off
putting lots of chips over the table, you would win some and lose lots,
sometimes you would win more than your stake, what is the sense in that,
this is something I see people do all the time. Being a novice I dabbled
with the Martingale system, ouch, you would think it was working for you,
then six losses in a row, it was painful. So next I moved on to 2 column's
and / or 2 dozens out of three, with a mainly trebling the bet sometimes
doubling after a loss. Thought I was on to a sure thing at 64%. Used a
very big bankroll and had a fair bit of success. Followed by a lot of big
losses. Didn't play for some time.
Work out the odds on this sequence: many years ago I was progressive betting
and had chips on the following even money bets: Red, Even and High (18-36),
and lost three spins in a row, without the spinner hitting zero. After the
third loss, he said to his pit boss, maybe I'm being too hard on him. On
another occasion, some Asian chick hit 10 different numbers in the first
dozen, while I was backing the other two dozen's.
I have spent years studying the game. Reckon I came up with a great system
that was basically 75.5-86.5% in my favour, and provides a 12.5% return,
depending on the percentage, and recovery after a loss, far better in my
opinion than the two column bet, with a two spin triple up. It was a great
system, you didn't feel stuck to a table, "the ball must land in this column
next, bullshit". I have researched the game extensively on the net, I know
the ball has no memory, can land in 1 column 6, 7 time etc. My system took
out the equation of the spinner aiming for zero, ball landing in the same
column etc, all bases were covered.
I did very well, turn $350 into over 5 grand on 2 occasions, could win a
grand with regularity, was winning 1 or 2 thousand a night, things were
looking sweet, then bang, nothing. I'm playing a game that gives me odds of
anything between 75.5-86.5%, can even take it up to 91% but the returns are
too low for the outlay. Yet now I struggle to get a single win. So what
changed, well first off the spinners. I play at the Sky City Adelaide, and
played at the Sky City Auckland. The spinners I was winning against, I don't
see anymore, these were the ones who did NOT look at the wheel when
releasing the ball. The ones where I would win 15-18 times on the trot at
$100 profit per spin. Now I see new spinners, and probability is defied,
the ball lands 6/7 times in the same column, busting column bettors. All
new faces, probably brought down from the "member's room". Will hit numbers
that I have not covered constantly, yet it's 75-86.5% in my favour. I'm a
big player, and when I arrive at a table, the spinner usually changes soon
after. Have tried placing chips after the ball is released, but my method
by this time is well sussed.
This leads me to my point, Roulette is bullshit, spinners aim, pure and
simple, they practise for hours, use the zero as a marker, and they know the
amount of rotations it will complete, know the amount of pressure to exert,
the number of rotations the inside wheel will complete, and so forth, will
it still be in motion when the ball decides to drop ? After many, many
weeks of playing, I've picked things up like the pit boss telling a new
spinner to hit a certain number, "put it on six" which I did not have
covered, I should of seen it coming, his first spin, he lands in on six.
On another occasion in Auckland a spinner not being able to contain her
excitement at aiming for zero, yet hitting 32 when I had $400 on the two
outside column's, she shouted to her bit boss, "I got it". Taking to a
ex-spinner who's working the casino's in Asia, confirmed to me that,
spinners can place the ball accurately, it takes lots of practise, like
years, but it can be done. I heard the comment that the payoff for the
spinner, who downunder you can not tip, that if they are quote "good for the
casino", they get promoted to the "private members" area. A much more
pleasant environment to work in. While I have never played in the US, so I
don't know if the same situation exists there, but down-under be under no
illusion, Roulette is not a game of chance, randomness, when playing with
big stakes, you are competing against the spinner, pure and simple.
|
|