| Re: Anything showing in Giga? |
EasyNews, UseNet made Ea .. |
| me (me@home.org) |
2009/03/18 22:33 |
Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!not.news-service.com!not.alt.net!not.highwinds-media.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!easynews-local!fe05.news.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: me@home.org
Newsgroups: alt.fan.zippo
Subject: Re: Anything showing in Giga?
Message-ID: <uni3s4p57dr1rudnhmaosmoignphg615tg@4ax.com>
References: <cUdwl.125031$EO2.27680@newsfe04.iad>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.0/32.1071
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 101
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: EasyNews, UseNet made Easy!
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 04:33:51 GMT
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.zippo:41
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:41:28 GMT, avoice <my@soapbox.org> wrote:
>NP-f31 <dudewiththe(REMOVE)hair@hushmail.com> wrote in
>news:h9d2s452necm362dlcj3098nfethpn45gf@4ax.com:
>
>> On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 08:52:12 GMT, me@home.org wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:37:32 +1100, Superchappie@dontspamme.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:18:31 +1100, Superchappie@dontspamme.com
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Looking today and all I can see is just text files with references
>>>>>to jpg's.
>>>>>
>>>>>Is the retension very short or does Giga have a problem with this
>>>>>group?
>>>>>
>>>>>TIA Superchappie
>>>>
>>>>Thanks everyone for your comments.
>>>>
>>>>I like the suggestion of Binarie Group as named, but it must be up to
>>>>Avoice.
>>>>
>>>>Love your posts so would appreciate your thoughts on a change.
>>>>
>>>>TIA
>>>>
>>>>Superchappie
>>>
>>>Please read my post. As long as we all agree, i don't believe it
>>>should up to 'one' person. That hints at exactly why we left the
>>>'other' group.
>>> Everything should be collective. No one should be in charge.
>>
>>
>> Hi Me,
>>
>> A 'collective' implies that everyone will contribute to the community.
>> If a few people do all of the work then the collective concept falls
>> apart. It doesn't take the contributors long to figure out that since
>> they're doing all the work, they make as well concentrate on making
>> each other happy. That is why there are so many groups with private,
>> encrypted, non-shared files.
>>
>> You will find that avoice is one of the most reasonable and unselfish
>> posters in the groups today. And if you think about it, YOU are here
>> today because he decided to revive this group after being kindly
>> booted out of the other group he revived.
>>
>> Posters rule. That is the way it has to be because I've found no one
>> yet who can make all the lurkers happy. If you want to be a poster,
>> then I suggest that you do so and people will be more willing to
>> listen to you. In fact, you can establish your own group in daws, if
>> you want. If you choose to do so, I will add your group to the list
>> and I will even post in support of you in that group. Deal?
>>
>> Since avoice stepped back into zippo a week ago, there have been three
>> posters: avoice, gustav and dudewiththehair (Doc NP-f31). If they are
>> going to post then they are the ones who get to decide about where,
>> how and what to post. Anyone else who wants to access what they post
>> will need to make the proper arrangements whether it be news service
>> providers, news readers, etc. As for me, I think avoice is awesome, he
>> is a friend, and I will follow wherever he goes and post in support of
>> him.
>>
>> I hope this doesn't come off as sounding snarky. These are facts, not
>> judgments I spouting.
>>
>> My best to you all,
>>
>> Doc
>> NP-f31
>>
>> PS- Thanks avoice for your latest installment. I can't wait for the
>> next one.
>>
>>
>
>
>Hi Doc,
>
>If any moves are to be made to another group. It would take a collective
>effort to build retention there as any posts made would just disappear
>into cyberspace within nanoseconds of posting. Is everyone willing to do
>their part? Using the server I am making these posts with severely
>limits the amount of posting I can do. The burden of establishing
>retention would have to be borne by you.
>
>Otherwise I am comfortable posting here.
>
>I am open to suggestions.
>
>
>avoice
>"flickin' my zippo"
Retention is up to each newsserver.
Giganews announced this past monday, that they are now at 365 days.
Easynews (when it's working) is at about 100.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
|
|