Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: bja@ix.netcom.com (Jim Austin)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.winona-ryder
Subject: Re: Winona in 2004
Date: 12 Dec 2003 13:30:46 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <bc3dd28f.0312121330.4e61b998@posting.google.com>
References: <2YSyb.13496$P%1.12439287@newssvr28.news.prodigy.com> <cn8osv4unk3qbgrp1g6nvoi4qp6dts2rv6@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.73.31.34
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1071264646 5457 127.0.0.1 (12 Dec 2003 21:30:46 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 21:30:46 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.winona-ryder:79
Cullinane wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 02:39:58 GMT, "Doug" <nospam@nospam.net> wrote:
>
> >Winona Ryder still has the best role of her career inside her. 2004 will be
> >the year she proves her talent.
Hope so.
> Hopefully her talent isn't shoplifting...
If it was, she would never have been caught, and nobody would ever
know. The worse one could say is that she had some personal problems
that manefested themselves in klepto tendencies.
> ...or abusing prescription drugs.
Never proven, which is why drug charges were dropped.
> She's miserable at doing that.
Indeed.
|
|