Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Rivergoat <goat@goathead.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.winona-ryder
Subject: Re: Winona is engaged to Blake Sennett?
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 07:50:02 -0800
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: <j0p2t3la0pm90hk9vmloe2s4ovbu11es8h@4ax.com>
References: <9835-47CAA094-460@storefull-3311.bay.webtv.net> <846-47CD347C-51@storefull-3312.bay.webtv.net> <mbcrs35ota4ni9pa65kqcfpphtjm09lfqq@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.646
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
Lines: 15
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.winona-ryder:594
Either way, she looks damn cute in that pic :)
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 12:30:54 -0800, OddBALL <odd@ball.net> wrote:
>On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 03:37:32 -0800, ILoveWinona@webtv.net (Rusty Winona
>fan) wrote:
>
>>Well, it was a false alarm. :) ----- Winona Ryder Not Engaged at
>>Hollywood.com
>>http://www.hollywood.com/news/Winona_Ryder_Not_Engaged/5094372 ----- :)
>>Rusty
>
>
>Oh wow.
|
|