Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!not.news-service.com!not.alt.net!not.highwinds-media.com!s02-b69!textbe01-phx!hwmnpeer02.phx!hw-filter.phx!hwmnpeer01.phx!hwmnpeer01.lga!news.highwinds-media.com!news.glorb.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!easynews-local!fe12.news.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: HMS Victor Victorian <VictorVictorianREMOVE@hushmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy
Subject: Re: Leyland complaint
Organization: Her Majesty's Service
Reply-To: PrinceAlbert@RuleBritannia
Message-ID: <moi7g31jk7r6nr0svru4be1l8fc2i10bb5@4ax.com>
References: <myaddress-36B464.14022003102007@news.easynews.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 35
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 17:02:22 GMT
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy:536
X-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 19:09:05 UTC (s02-b69)
On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:59:14 GMT, the non <myaddress@server.co> wrote:
>The following email was sent to Easynews following notice that Leyland
>had complained about innocuous posted material:
>
>It has come to my attention that an individual using the name Steve
>This individual seeks to be offended by posts, even if they are totally
>innocuous. In other words, his motive is simply to disrupt the
>otherwise peaceful activity of others. Easynews would be well advised
>to respond cautiously, if at all, to complaints mounted by this
>individual. Inasmuch as I am not privy to your procedure in responding
>to complaints, I would nevertheless suggest that no complaint be acted
>upon unless it is substantiated from a number of diverse sources.
>
>In at least one such complaint by this individual, the subject matter
>was Russian nudist photography from the 1950s, in which there were no
>pornographic components: I am very familiar with both the genre and the
>period. The aforenamed individual then posted messages bragging about
>his complaint and the Easynews action in withdrawing the group of photos
>from circulation. That, in itself, is grounds for disqualifying that
>person from consideration of actionable complaints. To pose an analogy,
>would Easynews remove photos of Ferraris because someone objected to
>Italians? While there may be legitimate abuse complaints, they are more
>likely to center around harrassment by militant individuals than posters
>of topical information. It would be in the best interests of Easynews
>not to take seriously the howling complaints of psychotic crusaders.
Thank you, Non.
I have written a complaint, but they have not deemed an immediate
response proper, I suppose.
God Save Her Majesty the Queen.
God Preserve the Prince of Wales.
Rule Britannia!
|
|