Tedn'Alice@notellin.com wrote in
news:a9qk93d1v1e3oee4hnrrcoc2f4q2nbppb9@4ax.com:
> On 15 Jul 2007 10:15:02 -0500, unkn <76636@dot.com> wrote:
>
>>HMS Victor Victorian <VictorVictorianREMOVE@hushmail.com> wrote in
>>news:i08k935fjdg37g48idh803en87h0kkf71m@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 11:59:50 GMT, the non <myaddress@server.co>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>It is curious that when there is the prospect of money to be made,
>>>>men who claim they were "molested" by Roman Catholic priests come
>>>>out of the woodwork. Is this anything but retroactive prostitution?
>>>> As far as I know, it is unique for someone to make a claim,
>>>>unsupported by evidence, and have it stick. Since my retirement is
>>>>a little lean, perhaps I need to claim abuse by clergy. $$!
>>>
>>> The pertinent questions are two:
>>>
>>> First: Are you Catholic?
>>> Second: Have you a good lawyer?
>>>
>>> God Save Her Majesty the Queen.
>>> God Preserve the Prince of Wales.
>>> Rule Britannia!
>>
>>
>>mmm, I wonder how many touches make an abuse....
>
> Just takes one accusation.
> Not necessarily even a touch ... just an accusation.
>
just that? mmm, guess who was raised in a catholic school... lol
|
|