Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!not.news-service.com!not.alt.net!not.highwinds-media.com!s03-b33.iad!npeersf01.iad.highwinds-media.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!postnews.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!news.astraweb.com!border5.a.newsrouter.astraweb.com!not-for-mail
Subject: Re: ATTN: HMS V V, et. al. MISSING 3 Pics from "Gleenings"
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 14:04:34 -0400
From: Mover <Mover@Watch-Me.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy
Reply-To: Mover
Message-ID: <120620101404345030%Mover@Watch-Me.com>
References: <4c130f4d$0$204$bb4e3ad8@newscene.com> <one716pqkn0ethiv8sukhu8hv0poksevso@4ax.com>
Organization: Move He - Thee Ate Her
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Thoth/1.8.3 (Macintosh)
X-No-Archive: yes
Lines: 54
NNTP-Posting-Host: 0465787c.news.astraweb.com
X-Trace: DXC=207S`B5@ncmJ?XMfTm0i_cL?0kYOcDh@j3E5>gaGjiFnCl>T<oeA]RdMXa:FKNT3ImcjLX:m\[D7k5:SHEYhkTKa@eWIM;1Y>=k
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy:2436
X-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 18:07:19 UTC (s03-b33.iad)
In article <one716pqkn0ethiv8sukhu8hv0poksevso@4ax.com>, HMS Victor
Victorian <victorvictorian@hushunomail.com> wrote:
> On 11 Jun 2010 23:40:12 -0500, "Group_Troll"
> <GroupTroll@Pissed.Off.nl> wrote:
>
> >i suggest you learn how to count.
> >
> >i suggest you find those missing pics.
> >
> >i suggest you post them ASAP!
> >
> >i hate being cheated out of 3 pics.
>
> My Dear Sir,
>
> You are quite correct. I have managed to exclude three pictures from
> the set of 100. It wasn't intentional, you see, but sometimes ...
> well, I get rather flustered when reviewing the fare I am about to
> offer, to confirm that each meets the legal criteria in my particular
> jurisdiction! So occasionally, I come across a picture that perhaps
> could be misinterpreted by a particularly salacious eye, and I think,
> "Well, could that be interpreted as an ... (ahem) ... it certainly
> looks, from this angle, very straight and stiff and, indeed,
> throbbingly turgid ... yet I am somewhat confident that it isn't
> actually an ... (ahem) ... BUT, given the perceived fangled angle of
> the dangle from this PARTICULAR angle, it could very well be
> misinterpreted as a ... (ahem, yes) ... so, better safe than sorry or,
> in Falstaff's words, discretion being the better of valour ... I had
> best delete this one." "And two." "And three." And thus I did.
>
> Oh! But I had forgot to renumber the series! My! So you will forgive
> me that I have inadvertantly-so deprived you of the three rather
> naughty images.
>
> Most Apoplectically ... err ... Apologetically,
>
> HMS Victor Victorian
> God Save the Queen.
> God Bless the Prince of Wales.
> God Preserve the Windsors.
> Rule Britannia!
Well done! I particularly liked "the perceived fangled angle of
the dangle from this PARTICULAR angle". I jealously wish I had written
that.
As something new to me, I had never seen "fangled" without "new" in
front of it.
I think "throbbingly turgid" may make it a little difficult for him to
forgive your triple omission. Oh my poor green pet! LOL
Mover, the admirer
|
|