| Re: A Caveat of Their Own |
EasyNews, UseNet made Ea .. |
| Moi (Moi@Moi.com) |
2008/05/05 14:21 |
Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!not.news-service.com!not.alt.net!not.highwinds-media.com!t3!artnm!t1!feeder.news-service.com!postnews.google.com!news3.google.com!out04a.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in04.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!news-in-02.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!easynews-local!fe03.news.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Moi <Moi@Moi.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy
Subject: Re: A Caveat of Their Own
Message-ID: <52ru14t9d7jrro2sdmbuacsdetv5ni3nes@4ax.com>
References: <tvpu14lpmba9fsk7ac98cg0d33h5k1ohgu@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 32
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: EasyNews, UseNet made Easy!
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 20:21:46 GMT
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy:1473
On Mon, 05 May 2008 20:14:04 GMT, HMS Victor Victorian
<VictorVictorian@NBG.com> wrote:
>Note that the IWF considers the term "pornography" as having a
>somewhat legitimising effect, so they kindly request you all to refer
>to images rather as "PRCBSA" (rather cumbersome, certainly, but please
>see below).
>
>"Please note that "child pornography", "child porn" or "kiddie porn"
>are not acceptable terms. The use of such language acts to legitimise
>images which are not pornography, rather, they are permanent records
>of children being sexually abused and as such should be referred to as
>child sexual abuse images."
>
>The IWF's determination of what types of images constitute PRCBSA is a
>very wide one, indeed, if one considers the number of types of groups
>suddenly esponged from various news service providers. Is a picture
>of a nude boy standing, casting a fishing line out on a lake shore, a
>PRCBSA? If not, does it become a PRCBSA if one crops the image to
>centre the viewers line of sight with the lad's genitals? If the boy
>smiling or laughing, is he still being abused?
>
>Well, fear not. To paraphrase a rather succinct American judge, your
>heroes at IWF "know it when they see it--and you should, too!"
>
>Cheers,
>
>Victor
email me if you still have my email addy
Cheers
Moi
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
|
|