| Re: Just the Naked Facts, Please! |
UTB |
| Naughty Boy (naughtynaughty) |
2008/05/04 17:08 |
Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!not.news-service.com!not.alt.net!not.highwinds-media.com!textbe01-phx!hwmnpeer02.phx!hw-filter.phx!hwmnpeer01.phx!news.highwinds-media.com!out02b.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in04.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in03.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!news.alt.net
From: Naughty Boy <naughtynaughty>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy
Subject: Re: Just the Naked Facts, Please!
Date: Sun, 4 May 2008 23:08:07 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: UTB
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <Xns9A955D9D2824Eutb@207.14.116.130>
References: <olsm14lgp082rindmqejv6d7u713jna9ei@4ax.com>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-No-Archive: yes
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy:1468
X-Received-Date: Sun, 04 May 2008 21:33:24 MST (textbe01-phx)
HMS Victor Victorian <Victor(remove)Victorian@hushmail.com> wrote in
news:olsm14lgp082rindmqejv6d7u713jna9ei@4ax.com:
>
> I present here some relevant information for those of you who are
> disinclined to wade through the jargon of the Internet Watch
> Foundation web site. The following is a direct quote as to the
> expectations imposed upon their full members [no lewd puns, PLEASE!]
>
>
> "In addition, the IWF recommends that Full Members do not provide
> access to particular newsgroups, based on whether the newsgroups
> regularly contain child abuse images or whether they have names that
> appear to advertise paedophile content or advocate paedophile
> activity."
>
> The implicaton is that if the IWF feels any particular group even
> appears to "advocate" (endorse, defend, etc. ad nauseum) child love,
> full member ISPs are pressured to drop them, whether a single image or
> video even remotely scandalous had been posted or not.
>
> One wonders what their specific criteria might be to make such a
> determination, and from whence it is drawn!
Because society hates pedos. Deal with it.
--
Look at that. The one, the only, the original, the stupid Naughty Boy is
back. Who said Usenet couldn't go further downhill?
|
|
|