On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:27:44 GMT, HMS Victor Victorian
<VictorVictorianREMOVE@hushmail.com> employed an infinite number of
monkeys on an infinite number of typewriter to say:
>On 21 Jan 2008 17:37:02 -0600, +Grant <+Grant@grant.grant> wrote:
>
>>In article <40a9p31r6pp7dm5ni3npqfscge6nff9qmm@4ax.com>, HMS Victor
>>Victorian <VictorVictorianREMOVE@hushmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Your attempted posting of Mondo covers did not come through EasyNews
>>> completely. Do you have indication that the complete post came
>>> through?
>>>
>>> Thank you. Your efforts are always appreciated!
>>>
>>> VV
>>> God Save Her Majesty the Queen.
>>> God Preserve the Prince of Wales.
>>> Rule Britannia!
>>
>>
>>I have a strange (software) way of posting individual files using my
>>laptop. I wasn't sure multisegment files would go through. I see they
>>didn't. I can post them as single large attachments of around 8MB each
>>or I can make them smaller jpgs or wait until I get to my home desktop
>>computer to use powerpost. I will do it right one way or another.
>>
>>One more thing. I liked your comments about mud.
>>I raise a glass to you and say "here's boy in your eye!"
>>
>>Another more thing. Easynews allows the path to be user modified (but
>>not all of it). Newscene doesn't. There is a lot of header info that
>>can be modified that most people don't about if you have the right
>>software and know how it works. I do some of it with my posts.
>>If you want an explanation of anything in a posts header let me know.
>>There is proof in your respective headers that you and boys'n'bees are
>>not the same poster unless you are commuting back and forth between
>>time zones between posts. Oden should have checked that.
>>
>>A last more thing. UTB is a troll club. using this group to post what
>>the trolls like to target the most wasn't a very good idea from the
>>start. In fact it was stupid. Anyway here we are with a thriving
>>binaries posting group. Should I continue with the mistake by posting
>>what they say is off topic material in *their* group? Well their
>>opinions don't matter much to me as long as they are doing worse to the
>>other BL groups. They stop posting off topic things (trolling) in our
>>groups and I will take more seriously what they say about what should
>>be posted in this group. Meanwhile I plan to post Mondo here when I get
>>to my home computer. Unless a *real* poster objects. LOL
>
>Thank you for your thoughtful comments. Regarding my own identity in
>contrast to any other poster, I am completely willing to allow those
>who claim superior knowledge of usenet conventions to make fools of
>themselves. Their opinions don't particularly weigh much, at any
>rate.
>
>I must take exception to your comments regarding the use of this group
>for its present purposes. Tedn'Alice chose this group for that very
>reason ... it was a troll group, named for a particularly obnoxious
>troll, Naughty Boy aka El Trauco. Insomuch as it was, with the
>exception of the typical spam regarding the enlargement of certain
>male members, completely deserted, he decided that turn-about was fair
>play. Indeed he very much intended to infuriate the trolls. So he
>"rennovated it," never dreaming it would become a going affair. The
>fact that it has become so is a direct result of neglect by these now
>suddenly possessive trolls. You can imagine Ted's initial
>disappointment!
>
>Hence, their present agitation and consternation is a source of great
>satisfaction. Discovering that the groups was apparently founded by
>Frogbutt eight years ago is simply cream in our tea!
>
>Stupid? Why? What are they capable of doing, pray tell? There has
>been nothing posted here that could be seen as a violation of law or,
>for that matter, even good taste, with the exception of the trolls
>themselves. They rattle about like dottering old men, muttering things
>about "Bubba" and "Breaking Doors at Dawn" etc. All very boring. But
>if you, or any contributor, decide posting here makes you
>uncomfortable, I personally would understand and encourage you to post
>elsewhere. Many threats have been made ... and none come to
>fruition. They continue to labour under their misconceptions and
>delusions because, in reality, it is their "ownly" discourse.
>
>But, all in all, this is not the first "off topic" group to have been
>taken by another interest. Usenet is anarchy ... beautiful and clean.
>One may claim to "own" a group, just as one might grab a handful of
>cloud, or capture sunbeams in a shoebox. For whatever his
>motivations, Ted found this group completely deserted and subsequently
>started the Galleries. It has been an ongoing establishment for over
>10 months. I applaud him.
>
>Lastly, if the trolls decide to assault these parapets, they will find
>them unexpectedly resilient. I for one would certainly enjoy the idea
>of taking up so much of their time and upload quota, particularly when
>an effective offensive could easily be mounted in other "troll"
>gathering bogs.
>
>Alright then. My very best to you.
>
>Victor
>God Save Her Majesty the Queen.
>God Preserve the Prince of Wales.
>Rule Britannia!
Gee whiz, we shouldn't let this eloquence escape the Google archives.
I noticed that you both have accidentally set your X-No-Archive bits
to Yes.
--
mhm 29x8
"Enemy to those who make him an enemy. Friend to those who have no
friend."
--from the intro to the Boston Blackie radio show (1945)
"You don't have to be a member of the KKK to be a wizard under the sheets"
Proud member of the I am Spooge lits
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
|