Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: The Bible vs. the Enuma Elish and Gilgamesh
Organization: Pern
Reply-To: ehxong@bcgbayvar.arg
Message-ID: <r6tnsv0pahnjqjc5abbm2inbi6q5or2hmc@Pern.rk>
References: <mIHxb.54581$t01.19729@twister.socal.rr.com> <Xns94415E80B11E8Mekkala@199.45.49.11> <bq7qnb$avh$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl> <l54fsvs3pk5sca42kgbv2air0hhqrg9mvv@4ax.com> <bqa4ba$qad$1@news.onet.pl> <8gmlsvg39815kfd31mokr627n59a0jlqjm@Pern.rk> <bqesiq$601$1@news.onet.pl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 42
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 02:16:13 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.186.221.222
X-Complaints-To: abuse@cv.net
X-Trace: news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net 1070331373 24.186.221.222 (Mon, 01 Dec 2003 21:16:13 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 21:16:13 EST
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:941
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:00:51 +0100, "Piorokrat" <piorokrat@autograf.pl>
posted in alt.atheism:
>Uzytkownik "Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> napisal w wiadomosci
>news:8gmlsvg39815kfd31mokr627n59a0jlqjm@Pern.rk...
>> On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 13:38:29 +0100, "Piorokrat"
>> <piorokrat@autograf.pl> posted in alt.atheism:
>> >Uzytkownik "raven1" <cflpurqryrcunag@synfuznvy.pbz> napisal w wiadomosci
>> >news:l54fsvs3pk5sca42kgbv2air0hhqrg9mvv@4ax.com...
>> >> ROT-13 on Email to reply.
>> >Well that's too much work for a start.
>> It wouldn't be if you used a real news client.
>If I used a real news client, it wouldn't be so easy for me to swap easily
>between e-mails and usenet about twenty times in the course of a day.
If I want to respond to this in an email, I type "F". If I want to
respond in usenet, I type "R". I know typing "R" is much more
difficult than typing "F", but after a few years it becomes a little
easier.
>I need that more than I need ROTFL-13, that's for sure.
I have all 3, each with typing one key.
>And why don't you use a proper encryption system, come to that?
>My OE is PGP enabled.
I don't send "encrypted" posts to usenet but, if I wanted to sign my
posts, I can PGP-sign them. I just don;t see any reason to use the
bandwidth.
But, if you're talking about raven1's email munging, PGP-signing his
posts wouldn't prevent email scavenging. ROT-13ing them will.
--
Zymurgist # 2
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at optonline dot net
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 |
|