alt.fan.uncle-daveyPrev. Next
Re: Baptism: Not A Requirement for Salvation Posted via Supernews, ht ..
Mike Bugal (mbugalNOSPAM@yahoo.com) 2003/12/01 12:20

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Mike Bugal" <mbugalNOSPAM@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: Baptism: Not A Requirement for Salvation
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 11:20:36 -0800
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: <vsmu6bc78rvf47@corp.supernews.com>
References: <vsm893o7att892@corp.supernews.com> <bqf9q2$697$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl> <FXFyb.60758$t01.39970@twister.socal.rr.com> <vsmcgbk7rg6nf3@corp.supernews.com> <bqfd9p$h7n$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
Lines: 26
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:926

"Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
news:bqfd9p$h7n$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl...
> > By the way, have you actually read "Answers to Some Frequently Heard
> Objections
> > to Biblical Baptism" (one of the two article you were supposed to do a
> "point by
> > point refutation" of)? There is a link at the end of that article that
> leads to
> > another page titled, "Further Objections To Biblical Baptism" that
> addressed
> > your essay... your promised link is there. It appears one of us knows what
> > "integrity" means!
>
> In this thou spakest truly.
>

Yes, and now everyone in Usenet knows that it ISN'T "Uncle" Davey or "Dr."
Jason.

His and Yours,

Mike Bugal
Heartland Chapel Ministries
http://www.heartlandchapel.org



Follow-ups:1234567891011121314151617181920
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite