In article <V22ge.100874$3V3.70139@edtnps89>,
La N <nilita2004NOSPAM@yahoo.com> wrote:
>< snipped UMA unless you want them to know about your own
>personal Usenet history>
<Foghorn Leghorn>
"Why, Boy, I say Boy, I think she's attempting to disguise
a threat as a friendly gesture. You just can't trust them
friendly gestures anymore" <sad shake of the head>
</Foghorn Leghorn>
>
>"Allisson" <allisson@panix.com> wrote in message
>news:d5q7ve$1r4$1@reader1.panix.com...
>> In article <6iqq71li8htevpoeldm0qcodiq3e07urut@4ax.com>,
>> cbianco <gotosplitbraindotcom@yourpleasure.org> wrote:
>>>dan trg nil:
>>>
>>>>>>Humility compels me to take exception to the word "cause."
>>>>>>I do not "cause" problems; I merely facilitate them.
>>>
>>>>> I love that quote; that's truly sig-worthy.
>>>
>>>yes.
>>>
>>>backed by 15 years of ruthless R and D.
>>
>> Rhetoric and Demagoguery?
I still what what "r" and which "d."
Ruminations and Diatribes?
>>
>> [Nil=o's feints]>
>>>>Danimal has way too much time on his hands.
>>
>> I'm certain he'd agree with you -- otherwise why the constant
>> haranguing about wasted time on usenet. Although, having
>> benefited from courses in logical debate (GRE analytical writing score)
>> at Danimal university, I'm unsure whose time is wasted. Except
>> maybe the person whom resorts to petty jabs at time spent on Usenet
>> by others.
>>
>>>>And so far he has been
>>>>unsuccessful in his attempts to fracture friendships/relationships.
>>>
>>>henry james' definition of an artist is "one on whom nothing is lost".
>>
>> I think the James brothers would have liked Dan. I find it telling
>> that Nil-o's perception is that Dan "cares" about who is friends with or
>> is in relationships with whom. I wonder what else Nil=o can project
>> about her worldview.
>>
>>
]\
>Whatever you fantasize about me,
Eew. Nil=o wants me to fantasize about her. Can I fantasize
about some one else of her vintage, like Richard Gere? At least
he has wit, charm, talent, and is the right gender,
>
you gossipy harpy, there is
>no way I would stoop as low as you have to make your mark
>on Usenet.
Oliver Goldsmith wept.
>Instead of making third party jab at others,
I suppose that to an insecure person, my doubting their
psychic abilities to read Dan's mind and ascribing them
to their own world-view, would be seen as a jab to their
ego.
>how about working
>on cleaning up your own act
YOu mean I should post as much and as often as you do -- with
full "fan-club" details, even? Is that the clean act that I should
emulate? Please post more, it amuses so many.
>and being a good role model
>for your kids.
You mean I should post about all the famous people the kids
have met? I fail to see how that is a good role model but if
you say so, maybe it will be the topic of my 100th post after
today, which should be, at the last year's rate, in 2010.
>Davey, if you are around, could you post the link to that story
>you wrote?
You mean you don't have your special collectors edition -- the
one where Sampson agreed that the plague was the best thing that
ever happened to you? Actually, I see Davey, like most of us, are
moving forward from the past
>I used to have it bookmarked but lost it when
>a special friend upgraded my pc ... ;)
Now *who* could that special friend be? Migsee I didn't know
hit the trail and made house calls to rural BC to fix PCs?
Allisson
--
Newborn Twins: Hot Food, Shower, Sleep (pick one)
OneYrOld Twins: Hot Food, Shower, Sleep (share one)
and no, Mommy's coffee isn't finger paint
|
|