On 9 Jan 2005 09:20:45 -0800 in free.christians, David ("David"
<hdsienkiewicz@yahoo.com>) said, directing the reply to
free.christians
>Uncle Davey wrote:
>> "David" <hdsienkiewicz@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:1105276890.723228.282400@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>> > Uncle Davey wrote:
>> > > "David" <hdsienkiewicz@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> > > news:1105274396.370916.145080@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>> > > > Uncle Davey wrote:
>> > > > > "David" <hdsienkiewicz@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> > > > > news:1105267923.287658.98380@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>> > > > > > Uncle Davey wrote:
>> > > > > > > "David" <hdsienkiewicz@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> > > > > > >
>news:1105210259.545030.208080@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > < snip >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Oh, I don't consider myself a victim, Davey, I was
>> > simply
>> > > > > > stating a
>> > > > > > > > > > limitation that I have because of my CHOSEN method
>of
>> > > > newsgroup
>> > > > > > > > > > participation.
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Google suits me fine.
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > < snip >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Backpeddling. You just said it didn't let you post
>all
>> > you
>> > > > > > wanted.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Oh, dear.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > You're such a TERRIBLE linguist, Davey, that you can't
>> > parse
>> > > > simple
>> > > > > > > > English.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Here's what I "said:"
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > "Google only allows so many posts in a time period that
>I
>> > have
>> > > > been
>> > > > > > > > unable to determine."
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > It pretty much usually allows me to post all I want,
>but if
>> > we
>> > > > > > can't
>> > > > > > > > get to the chase soon enough because of your stalling,
>> > > > equivocation
>> > > > > > and
>> > > > > > > > dilatory commentary, we might have to pick it up later,
>> > which
>> > > > is
>> > > > > > ALSO
>> > > > > > > > just fine with me.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > More backpeddling. If it allowed you to post all you
>want,
>> > you
>> > > > > > wouldn't even
>> > > > > > > have noticed it, much less whined about it.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Oh, my.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > So an observation of a limit within I must work is a
>"whine?"
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I think you confuse "what I want" with "as much as I am
>able in
>> > a
>> > > > > > certain period of time," Davey.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > But it's obvious that the level of your argumentation and
>your
>> > > > intent
>> > > > > > to divert from the issues at hand is a paramount importance
>to
>> > you
>> > > > > > right now, so have it your way.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I'm backpedalling.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I'm whining.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Those among us who actually give these things some thought
>will
>> > see
>> > > > > > that those things aren't true.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > I'll decide my points, Davey. You have a hard enough
>time
>> > > > > > explaining
>> > > > > > > > your own.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > I never heard such losertalk.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Oh, don't be bashful, Davey! SURE you have!
>> > > > > > > > Shucks, you've engaged in some of it yourself.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Beside your whines, mine pale into insignificance.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Really!
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > How so, Davey?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > All I said was that I had to work within certain limits and
>> > > > suggested
>> > > > > > that you give me something substantive to answer.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Your tactics in response are rather transparent.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > I think you are a major exporter of premium Californian
>> > whines.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > That would be fine if I was in California in more than a
>> > "virutal"
>> > > > > > sense, even if it is an old play on the word.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Most of your whines are about a certain Californian, so I
>think I
>> > can
>> > > > > stretch a point and say they are from there.
>> > >
>> > > > Well, yes, that would be QUITE a stretch, Davey.
>> > >
>> > > Well New York doesn't make wine, does it?
>> >
>> > I don't know. I'm far from an expert.
>> >
>> > Do you know what a Jewish American Princess's favorite wine is?
>> > "I wanna go to Mi-AMI!"
>>
>> Heh.
>>
>> Blumfeld asks his friend "do you like my copy of Da Vinci's "Mona
>Lisa"?"
>> his friend says "Sure, just like the original but why have you called
>it
>> "Mona Rebecca?" "Because the last time I visited my tax accountant,
>he
>> advised me to put everything in the name of my wife".
>
>If anyone ever wanted to know why accountants don't tell jokes, now you
>know.
So what does a Jewish American Princess say to her baby?
"Gucci, Gucci, Gucci, goo.....".
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 |
| 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 |
|