"David" <hdsienkiewicz@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1105276890.723228.282400@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Uncle Davey wrote:
> > "David" <hdsienkiewicz@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:1105274396.370916.145080@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> > > Uncle Davey wrote:
> > > > "David" <hdsienkiewicz@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:1105267923.287658.98380@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> > > > > Uncle Davey wrote:
> > > > > > "David" <hdsienkiewicz@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > > > > news:1105210259.545030.208080@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> > > > >
> > > > > < snip >
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Oh, I don't consider myself a victim, Davey, I was
> simply
> > > > > stating a
> > > > > > > > > limitation that I have because of my CHOSEN method of
> > > newsgroup
> > > > > > > > > participation.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Google suits me fine.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > < snip >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Backpeddling. You just said it didn't let you post all
> you
> > > > > wanted.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Oh, dear.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You're such a TERRIBLE linguist, Davey, that you can't
> parse
> > > simple
> > > > > > > English.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Here's what I "said:"
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "Google only allows so many posts in a time period that I
> have
> > > been
> > > > > > > unable to determine."
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It pretty much usually allows me to post all I want, but if
> we
> > > > > can't
> > > > > > > get to the chase soon enough because of your stalling,
> > > equivocation
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > dilatory commentary, we might have to pick it up later,
> which
> > > is
> > > > > ALSO
> > > > > > > just fine with me.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > More backpeddling. If it allowed you to post all you want,
> you
> > > > > wouldn't even
> > > > > > have noticed it, much less whined about it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Oh, my.
> > > > >
> > > > > So an observation of a limit within I must work is a "whine?"
> > > > >
> > > > > I think you confuse "what I want" with "as much as I am able in
> a
> > > > > certain period of time," Davey.
> > > > >
> > > > > But it's obvious that the level of your argumentation and your
> > > intent
> > > > > to divert from the issues at hand is a paramount importance to
> you
> > > > > right now, so have it your way.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm backpedalling.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm whining.
> > > > >
> > > > > Those among us who actually give these things some thought will
> see
> > > > > that those things aren't true.
> > > > >
> > > > > > > I'll decide my points, Davey. You have a hard enough time
> > > > > explaining
> > > > > > > your own.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I never heard such losertalk.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Oh, don't be bashful, Davey! SURE you have!
> > > > > > > Shucks, you've engaged in some of it yourself.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Beside your whines, mine pale into insignificance.
> > > > >
> > > > > Really!
> > > > >
> > > > > How so, Davey?
> > > > >
> > > > > All I said was that I had to work within certain limits and
> > > suggested
> > > > > that you give me something substantive to answer.
> > > > >
> > > > > Your tactics in response are rather transparent.
> > > > >
> > > > > > I think you are a major exporter of premium Californian
> whines.
> > > > >
> > > > > That would be fine if I was in California in more than a
> "virutal"
> > > > > sense, even if it is an old play on the word.
> > > >
> > > > Most of your whines are about a certain Californian, so I think I
> can
> > > > stretch a point and say they are from there.
> >
> > > Well, yes, that would be QUITE a stretch, Davey.
> >
> > Well New York doesn't make wine, does it?
>
> I don't know. I'm far from an expert.
>
> Do you know what a Jewish American Princess's favorite wine is?
> "I wanna go to Mi-AMI!"
Heh.
Blumfeld asks his friend "do you like my copy of Da Vinci's "Mona Lisa"?"
his friend says "Sure, just like the original but why have you called it
"Mona Rebecca?" "Because the last time I visited my tax accountant, he
advised me to put everything in the name of my wife".
Uncle Davey
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 |
| 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 |
|