Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "David" <hdsienkiewicz@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: Question to Marky Bilbo
Date: 9 Jan 2005 05:04:46 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 97
Message-ID: <1105274396.370916.145080@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
References: <crlk4r$72e$0@pita.alt.net>
<1105093023.049432.199450@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
<keWdnX5LPqzvLEPcRVn-qA@megapath.net>
<crme72$cv3$0@pita.alt.net>
<1105165823.908907.175400@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
<crogaq$d5i$0@pita.alt.net>
<1105184781.431583.141830@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
<crp33n$t7o$0@pita.alt.net>
<1105203930.297361.108280@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
<crp50m$321$0@pita.alt.net>
<1105206034.975343.247910@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
<crp683$5t3$0@pita.alt.net>
<1105206556.725104.282950@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
<crp85m$9q7$0@pita.alt.net>
<1105209187.221900.136960@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
<crp9p0$d10$0@pita.alt.net>
<1105210259.545030.208080@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
<crpapv$f3o$0@pita.alt.net>
<1105267923.287658.98380@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
<crr8b0$cnh$0@pita.alt.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.105.117.89
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1105275892 13461 127.0.0.1 (9 Jan 2005 13:04:52 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 13:04:52 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <crr8b0$cnh$0@pita.alt.net>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=68.105.117.89;
posting-account=ieRKiwwAAAAoKzdg6ksf7y5q5t5ATy7e
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:3816
Uncle Davey wrote:
> "David" <hdsienkiewicz@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1105267923.287658.98380@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> > Uncle Davey wrote:
> > > "David" <hdsienkiewicz@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > news:1105210259.545030.208080@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > < snip >
> >
> > > > > > Oh, I don't consider myself a victim, Davey, I was simply
> > stating a
> > > > > > limitation that I have because of my CHOSEN method of
newsgroup
> > > > > > participation.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Google suits me fine.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > < snip >
> > > > >
> > > > > Backpeddling. You just said it didn't let you post all you
> > wanted.
> > > >
> > > > Oh, dear.
> > > >
> > > > You're such a TERRIBLE linguist, Davey, that you can't parse
simple
> > > > English.
> > > >
> > > > Here's what I "said:"
> > > >
> > > > "Google only allows so many posts in a time period that I have
been
> > > > unable to determine."
> > > >
> > > > It pretty much usually allows me to post all I want, but if we
> > can't
> > > > get to the chase soon enough because of your stalling,
equivocation
> > and
> > > > dilatory commentary, we might have to pick it up later, which
is
> > ALSO
> > > > just fine with me.
> > >
> > > More backpeddling. If it allowed you to post all you want, you
> > wouldn't even
> > > have noticed it, much less whined about it.
> >
> > Oh, my.
> >
> > So an observation of a limit within I must work is a "whine?"
> >
> > I think you confuse "what I want" with "as much as I am able in a
> > certain period of time," Davey.
> >
> > But it's obvious that the level of your argumentation and your
intent
> > to divert from the issues at hand is a paramount importance to you
> > right now, so have it your way.
> >
> > I'm backpedalling.
> >
> > I'm whining.
> >
> > Those among us who actually give these things some thought will see
> > that those things aren't true.
> >
> > > > I'll decide my points, Davey. You have a hard enough time
> > explaining
> > > > your own.
> > > >
> > > > > I never heard such losertalk.
> > > >
> > > > Oh, don't be bashful, Davey! SURE you have!
> > > > Shucks, you've engaged in some of it yourself.
> > >
> > > Beside your whines, mine pale into insignificance.
> >
> > Really!
> >
> > How so, Davey?
> >
> > All I said was that I had to work within certain limits and
suggested
> > that you give me something substantive to answer.
> >
> > Your tactics in response are rather transparent.
> >
> > > I think you are a major exporter of premium Californian whines.
> >
> > That would be fine if I was in California in more than a "virutal"
> > sense, even if it is an old play on the word.
>
> Most of your whines are about a certain Californian, so I think I can
> stretch a point and say they are from there.
Well, yes, that would be QUITE a stretch, Davey.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 |
| 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 |
|