"David" <hdsienkiewicz@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1105267923.287658.98380@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Uncle Davey wrote:
> > "David" <hdsienkiewicz@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:1105210259.545030.208080@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> < snip >
>
> > > > > Oh, I don't consider myself a victim, Davey, I was simply
> stating a
> > > > > limitation that I have because of my CHOSEN method of newsgroup
> > > > > participation.
> > > > >
> > > > > Google suits me fine.
> > > > >
> > > > > < snip >
> > > >
> > > > Backpeddling. You just said it didn't let you post all you
> wanted.
> > >
> > > Oh, dear.
> > >
> > > You're such a TERRIBLE linguist, Davey, that you can't parse simple
> > > English.
> > >
> > > Here's what I "said:"
> > >
> > > "Google only allows so many posts in a time period that I have been
> > > unable to determine."
> > >
> > > It pretty much usually allows me to post all I want, but if we
> can't
> > > get to the chase soon enough because of your stalling, equivocation
> and
> > > dilatory commentary, we might have to pick it up later, which is
> ALSO
> > > just fine with me.
> >
> > More backpeddling. If it allowed you to post all you want, you
> wouldn't even
> > have noticed it, much less whined about it.
>
> Oh, my.
>
> So an observation of a limit within I must work is a "whine?"
>
> I think you confuse "what I want" with "as much as I am able in a
> certain period of time," Davey.
>
> But it's obvious that the level of your argumentation and your intent
> to divert from the issues at hand is a paramount importance to you
> right now, so have it your way.
>
> I'm backpedalling.
>
> I'm whining.
>
> Those among us who actually give these things some thought will see
> that those things aren't true.
>
> > > I'll decide my points, Davey. You have a hard enough time
> explaining
> > > your own.
> > >
> > > > I never heard such losertalk.
> > >
> > > Oh, don't be bashful, Davey! SURE you have!
> > > Shucks, you've engaged in some of it yourself.
> >
> > Beside your whines, mine pale into insignificance.
>
> Really!
>
> How so, Davey?
>
> All I said was that I had to work within certain limits and suggested
> that you give me something substantive to answer.
>
> Your tactics in response are rather transparent.
>
> > I think you are a major exporter of premium Californian whines.
>
> That would be fine if I was in California in more than a "virutal"
> sense, even if it is an old play on the word.
>
Most of your whines are about a certain Californian, so I think I can
stretch a point and say they are from there.
The following comma was supplied by one of my daughters:
,
cute, isn't it?
Uncle Davey
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 |
| 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 |
|